Re: [PATCH 059/190] Revert "RDMA/srpt: Remove unnecessary assertion in srpt_queue_response"

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:02:47AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 02:58:54PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This reverts commit 9f48db0d4a08624bb9ba847ea40c8abad753b396.
> > 
> > Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad
> > faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known
> > malicious" changes.  The result of these submissions can be found in a
> > paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
> > entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing
> > Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University
> > of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota).
> > 
> > Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from
> > the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if
> > they actually are a valid fix.  Until that work is complete, remove this
> > change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the
> > codebase.
> > 
> > Cc: https
> > Cc: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >  drivers/infiniband/ulp/srpt/ib_srpt.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> I think this one is fine

Sorry, I realize that is unclear. I mean I don't see a reason to
revert this patch.

Jason