Re: [PATCH][next] drm/amdkfd: fix uint32 variable compared to less than zero

[Felix Kuehling]

Am 2021-04-22 um 8:31 a.m. schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Currently the call to kfd_process_gpuidx_from_gpuid is returning an
> int value and this is being assigned to a uint32_t variable gpuidx
> and this is being checked for a negative error return which is always
> going to be false. Fix this by making gpuidx an int32_t. This makes
> gpuidx also type consistent with the use of gpuidx from the callers.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against 0")
> Fixes: cda0f85bfa5e ("drm/amdkfd: refine migration policy with xnack on")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied to amd-staging-drm-next.

Thanks,
  Felix


> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
> index 0e0b4ffd20ab..bf3c8de85b4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
> @@ -1330,7 +1330,7 @@ static void svm_range_unreserve_bos(struct svm_validate_context *ctx)
>   */
>  static int svm_range_validate_and_map(struct mm_struct *mm,
>  				      struct svm_range *prange,
> -				      uint32_t gpuidx, bool intr, bool wait)
> +				      int32_t gpuidx, bool intr, bool wait)
>  {
>  	struct svm_validate_context ctx;
>  	struct hmm_range *hmm_range;