[PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: ptrace: Add is_syscall_success to handle compat

[He Zhe]

The general version of is_syscall_success does not handle 32-bit
compatible case, which would cause 32-bit negative return code to be
recoganized as a positive number later and seen as a "success".

Since syscall_get_return_value is defined in syscall.h, implementing
is_syscall_success in ptrace.h would introduce build failure due to
recursive inclusion of some basic headers like mutex.h. Let's put the
implementation to ptrace.c

Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v1 to v2: Call syscall_get_return_value to reduce code duplication

 arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h | 3 +++
 arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c      | 5 +++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
index e58bca832dff..3c415e9e5d85 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -328,6 +328,9 @@ static inline void regs_set_return_value(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long rc)
 	regs->regs[0] = rc;
 }
 
+extern inline int is_syscall_success(struct pt_regs *regs);
+#define is_syscall_success(regs) is_syscall_success(regs)
+
 /**
  * regs_get_kernel_argument() - get Nth function argument in kernel
  * @regs:	pt_regs of that context
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
index 170f42fd6101..2c84255e1e41 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -1909,3 +1909,8 @@ int valid_user_regs(struct user_pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task)
 	else
 		return valid_native_regs(regs);
 }
+
+inline int is_syscall_success(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	return !IS_ERR_VALUE(syscall_get_return_value(current, regs));
+}
-- 
2.17.1