Re: [PATCH v4 09/27] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: More renames in prep for sub-devices

From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Fri Apr 23 2021 - 10:30:25 EST

Next message: Rasmus Villemoes: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Implement BPF formatted output helpers with bstr_printf"
Previous message: Borislav Petkov: "Re: [PATCH v2] tools/power turbostat: Fix RAPL summary collection on AMD processors"
In reply to: Douglas Anderson: "[PATCH v4 09/27] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: More renames in prep for sub-devices"
Next in thread: Douglas Anderson: "[PATCH v4 08/27] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Rename the main driver data structure"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri 16 Apr 17:39 CDT 2021, Douglas Anderson wrote:

> Like the previous patch ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Rename the main
> driver data structure") this is just a no-op rename in preparation for
> splitting the driver up a bit.
>
> Here I've attempted to rename functions / structures making sure that
> anything applicable to the whole chip (instead of just the MIPI to eDP
> bridge part) included "sn65dsi86" somewhere in the name instead of
> just "ti_sn_bridge".
>

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>

Regards,
Bjorn

> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> (no changes since v1)
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 84 +++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index f00ceb9dda29..57574132e200 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -164,30 +164,30 @@ struct ti_sn65dsi86 {
> #endif
> };
>
> -static const struct regmap_range ti_sn_bridge_volatile_ranges[] = {
> +static const struct regmap_range ti_sn65dsi86_volatile_ranges[] = {
> { .range_min = 0, .range_max = 0xFF },
> };
>
> static const struct regmap_access_table ti_sn_bridge_volatile_table = {
> - .yes_ranges = ti_sn_bridge_volatile_ranges,
> - .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_volatile_ranges),
> + .yes_ranges = ti_sn65dsi86_volatile_ranges,
> + .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn65dsi86_volatile_ranges),
> };
>
> -static const struct regmap_config ti_sn_bridge_regmap_config = {
> +static const struct regmap_config ti_sn65dsi86_regmap_config = {
> .reg_bits = 8,
> .val_bits = 8,
> .volatile_table = &ti_sn_bridge_volatile_table,
> .cache_type = REGCACHE_NONE,
> };
>
> -static void ti_sn_bridge_write_u16(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata,
> +static void ti_sn65dsi86_write_u16(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata,
> unsigned int reg, u16 val)
> {
> regmap_write(pdata->regmap, reg, val & 0xFF);
> regmap_write(pdata->regmap, reg + 1, val >> 8);
> }
>
> -static int __maybe_unused ti_sn_bridge_resume(struct device *dev)
> +static int __maybe_unused ti_sn65dsi86_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> int ret;
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused ti_sn_bridge_resume(struct device *dev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int __maybe_unused ti_sn_bridge_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +static int __maybe_unused ti_sn65dsi86_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> int ret;
> @@ -217,8 +217,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused ti_sn_bridge_suspend(struct device *dev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static const struct dev_pm_ops ti_sn_bridge_pm_ops = {
> - SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(ti_sn_bridge_suspend, ti_sn_bridge_resume, NULL)
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops ti_sn65dsi86_pm_ops = {
> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(ti_sn65dsi86_suspend, ti_sn65dsi86_resume, NULL)
> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend,
> pm_runtime_force_resume)
> };
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int status_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
>
> DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(status);
>
> -static void ti_sn_debugfs_init(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> +static void ti_sn65dsi86_debugfs_init(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> {
> pdata->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(pdata->dev), NULL);
>
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static void ti_sn_debugfs_init(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> &status_fops);
> }
>
> -static void ti_sn_debugfs_remove(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> +static void ti_sn65dsi86_debugfs_remove(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> {
> debugfs_remove_recursive(pdata->debugfs);
> pdata->debugfs = NULL;
> @@ -261,14 +261,14 @@ static void ti_sn_debugfs_remove(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
>
> /* Connector funcs */
> static struct ti_sn65dsi86 *
> -connector_to_ti_sn_bridge(struct drm_connector *connector)
> +connector_to_ti_sn65dsi86(struct drm_connector *connector)
> {
> return container_of(connector, struct ti_sn65dsi86, connector);
> }
>
> static int ti_sn_bridge_connector_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
> {
> - struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = connector_to_ti_sn_bridge(connector);
> + struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = connector_to_ti_sn65dsi86(connector);
> struct edid *edid = pdata->edid;
> int num, ret;
>
> @@ -314,12 +314,12 @@ static const struct drm_connector_funcs ti_sn_bridge_connector_funcs = {
> .atomic_destroy_state = drm_atomic_helper_connector_destroy_state,
> };
>
> -static struct ti_sn65dsi86 *bridge_to_ti_sn_bridge(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +static struct ti_sn65dsi86 *bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> {
> return container_of(bridge, struct ti_sn65dsi86, bridge);
> }
>
> -static int ti_sn_bridge_parse_regulators(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> +static int ti_sn65dsi86_parse_regulators(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> const char * const ti_sn_bridge_supply_names[] = {
> @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> enum drm_bridge_attach_flags flags)
> {
> int ret, val;
> - struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn_bridge(bridge);
> + struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> struct mipi_dsi_host *host;
> struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi;
> const struct mipi_dsi_device_info info = { .type = "ti_sn_bridge",
> @@ -425,12 +425,12 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>
> static void ti_sn_bridge_detach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> {
> - drm_dp_aux_unregister(&bridge_to_ti_sn_bridge(bridge)->aux);
> + drm_dp_aux_unregister(&bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge)->aux);
> }
>
> static void ti_sn_bridge_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> {
> - struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn_bridge(bridge);
> + struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
>
> drm_panel_disable(pdata->panel);
>
> @@ -648,9 +648,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_video_timings(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC)
> vsync_polarity = CHA_VSYNC_POLARITY;
>
> - ti_sn_bridge_write_u16(pdata, SN_CHA_ACTIVE_LINE_LENGTH_LOW_REG,
> + ti_sn65dsi86_write_u16(pdata, SN_CHA_ACTIVE_LINE_LENGTH_LOW_REG,
> mode->hdisplay);
> - ti_sn_bridge_write_u16(pdata, SN_CHA_VERTICAL_DISPLAY_SIZE_LOW_REG,
> + ti_sn65dsi86_write_u16(pdata, SN_CHA_VERTICAL_DISPLAY_SIZE_LOW_REG,
> mode->vdisplay);
> regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_CHA_HSYNC_PULSE_WIDTH_LOW_REG,
> (mode->hsync_end - mode->hsync_start) & 0xFF);
> @@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ static int ti_sn_link_training(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata, int dp_rate_idx,
>
> static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> {
> - struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn_bridge(bridge);
> + struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
> bool rate_valid[ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut)] = { };
> const char *last_err_str = "No supported DP rate";
> int dp_rate_idx;
> @@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>
> static void ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> {
> - struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn_bridge(bridge);
> + struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync(pdata->dev);
>
> @@ -853,7 +853,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>
> static void ti_sn_bridge_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> {
> - struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn_bridge(bridge);
> + struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = bridge_to_ti_sn65dsi86(bridge);
>
> drm_panel_unprepare(pdata->panel);
>
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs ti_sn_bridge_funcs = {
> .post_disable = ti_sn_bridge_post_disable,
> };
>
> -static struct ti_sn65dsi86 *aux_to_ti_sn_bridge(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
> +static struct ti_sn65dsi86 *aux_to_ti_sn65dsi86(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
> {
> return container_of(aux, struct ti_sn65dsi86, aux);
> }
> @@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ static struct ti_sn65dsi86 *aux_to_ti_sn_bridge(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
> static ssize_t ti_sn_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> {
> - struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = aux_to_ti_sn_bridge(aux);
> + struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = aux_to_ti_sn65dsi86(aux);
> u32 request = msg->request & ~(DP_AUX_I2C_MOT | DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE);
> u32 request_val = AUX_CMD_REQ(msg->request);
> u8 *buf = msg->buffer;
> @@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_parse_lanes(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata,
> pdata->ln_polrs = ln_polrs;
> }
>
> -static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> +static int ti_sn65dsi86_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> {
> struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata;
> @@ -1230,7 +1230,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> pdata->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client,
> - &ti_sn_bridge_regmap_config);
> + &ti_sn65dsi86_regmap_config);
> if (IS_ERR(pdata->regmap)) {
> DRM_ERROR("regmap i2c init failed\n");
> return PTR_ERR(pdata->regmap);
> @@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>
> ti_sn_bridge_parse_lanes(pdata, client->dev.of_node);
>
> - ret = ti_sn_bridge_parse_regulators(pdata);
> + ret = ti_sn65dsi86_parse_regulators(pdata);
> if (ret) {
> DRM_ERROR("failed to parse regulators\n");
> return ret;
> @@ -1291,12 +1291,12 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>
> drm_bridge_add(&pdata->bridge);
>
> - ti_sn_debugfs_init(pdata);
> + ti_sn65dsi86_debugfs_init(pdata);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int ti_sn_bridge_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +static int ti_sn65dsi86_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>
> @@ -1310,7 +1310,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> kfree(pdata->edid);
>
> - ti_sn_debugfs_remove(pdata);
> + ti_sn65dsi86_debugfs_remove(pdata);
>
> drm_bridge_remove(&pdata->bridge);
>
> @@ -1321,29 +1321,29 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static struct i2c_device_id ti_sn_bridge_id[] = {
> +static struct i2c_device_id ti_sn65dsi86_id[] = {
> { "ti,sn65dsi86", 0},
> {},
> };
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ti_sn_bridge_id);
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ti_sn65dsi86_id);
>
> -static const struct of_device_id ti_sn_bridge_match_table[] = {
> +static const struct of_device_id ti_sn65dsi86_match_table[] = {
> {.compatible = "ti,sn65dsi86"},
> {},
> };
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ti_sn_bridge_match_table);
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ti_sn65dsi86_match_table);
>
> -static struct i2c_driver ti_sn_bridge_driver = {
> +static struct i2c_driver ti_sn65dsi86_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "ti_sn65dsi86",
> - .of_match_table = ti_sn_bridge_match_table,
> - .pm = &ti_sn_bridge_pm_ops,
> + .of_match_table = ti_sn65dsi86_match_table,
> + .pm = &ti_sn65dsi86_pm_ops,
> },
> - .probe = ti_sn_bridge_probe,
> - .remove = ti_sn_bridge_remove,
> - .id_table = ti_sn_bridge_id,
> + .probe = ti_sn65dsi86_probe,
> + .remove = ti_sn65dsi86_remove,
> + .id_table = ti_sn65dsi86_id,
> };
> -module_i2c_driver(ti_sn_bridge_driver);
> +module_i2c_driver(ti_sn65dsi86_driver);
>
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Sandeep Panda <spanda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("sn65dsi86 DSI to eDP bridge driver");
> --
> 2.31.1.368.gbe11c130af-goog
>

Next message: Rasmus Villemoes: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Implement BPF formatted output helpers with bstr_printf"
Previous message: Borislav Petkov: "Re: [PATCH v2] tools/power turbostat: Fix RAPL summary collection on AMD processors"
In reply to: Douglas Anderson: "[PATCH v4 09/27] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: More renames in prep for sub-devices"
Next in thread: Douglas Anderson: "[PATCH v4 08/27] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Rename the main driver data structure"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]