On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 11:02 AM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Le 02/09/2020 à 19:41, Nick Desaulniers a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 5:14 AM Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Fixes: commit f2af201002a8 ("powerpc/build: vdso linker warning for orphan sections")
I think I'll just revert that for v5.9 ?
SGTM; you'll probably still want these changes with some modifications
at some point; vdso32 did have at least one orphaned section, and will
be important for hermetic builds. Seeing crashes in supported
versions of the tools ties our hands at the moment.
Keeping the tool problem aside with binutils 2.26, do you have a way to
really link an elf32ppc object when building vdso32 for PPC64 ?
Sorry, I'm doing a bug scrub and found
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/774 still open (and my
reply to this thread still in Drafts; never sent). With my patches
rebased:
$ file arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/vdso32.so
arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/vdso32.so: ELF 32-bit MSB shared object,
PowerPC or cisco 4500, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, stripped
Are you still using 2.26?
I'm not able to repro Nathan's reported issue from
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200902052123.GA2687902@ubuntu-n2-xlarge-x86/,
so I'm curious if I should resend the rebased patches as v2?