Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: x86: Introduce KVM_GET_SREGS2 / KVM_SET_SREGS2

From: Maxim Levitsky
Date: Mon Apr 26 2021 - 09:31:25 EST


On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 15:28 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 26/04/21 14:56, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 14:32 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > On 26/04/21 13:13, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > > + if (sregs2->flags & KVM_SREGS2_FLAGS_PDPTRS_VALID) {
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!is_pae_paging(vcpu))
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > + for (i = 0 ; i < 4 ; i++)
> > > > + kvm_pdptr_write(vcpu, i, sregs2->pdptrs[i]);
> > > > +
> > > > + kvm_register_mark_dirty(vcpu, VCPU_EXREG_PDPTR);
> > > > + mmu_reset_needed = 1;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > I think this should also have
> > >
> > > else {
> > > if (is_pae_paging(vcpu))
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> >
> > What about the case when we migrate from qemu that doesn't use
> > this ioctl to qemu that does?
>
> Right, that makes sense but then the "else" branch should do the same as
> KVM_SET_SREGS. Maybe add a "load_pdptrs" bool to __set_sregs_common?

Yes, I'll do something like that.
Thanks,
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky

>
> Paolo
>