Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] hwmon: (max31790) Rework to use regmap
From: Václav Kubernát
Date: Mon Apr 26 2021 - 10:30:14 EST
po 26. 4. 2021 v 16:18 odesílatel Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> napsal:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:46:27PM +0200, Václav Kubernát wrote:
> > Hello.
> > I'm sending a new version of my patch on max31790. This new version
> > fixes the cache issue and actually makes it work by setting
> > .cache_type. You were right about the "yes/no" ranges, so I flipped
> > those.
> > By the way, it seems that the reason your reply got lost is because of
> > weird addresses in the "Cc:" email field, they end with "cesnet.cz",
> > so it could be that I'm sending email incorrectly. Let me know if I'm
> > doing something wrong.
> Yes, the To: field of your series is either empty (for the first patch
> of the series), or it is something like:
> To: unlisted-recipients: no To-header on input <;
> Also, you send your follow-up series as response of the previous series
> which doesn't follow the guidance for submitting patches and may result
> in the entire series getting lost.
Sorry, I will fix my email-sending procedure. Should I resend the
patch series without the In-Reply-To field?