Re: [PATCH] net: called rtnl_unlock() before runpm resumes devices

From: Heiner Kallweit
Date: Tue Apr 27 2021 - 02:18:51 EST

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] uio: uio_pci_generic: add memory mappings"
Previous message: Mike Galbraith: "Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: don't use waker's cpu if the waker of sync wake-up is interrupt"
In reply to: AceLan Kao: "Re: [PATCH] net: called rtnl_unlock() before runpm resumes devices"
Next in thread: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH] net: called rtnl_unlock() before runpm resumes devices"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 27.04.2021 03:58, AceLan Kao wrote:
> I got another issue ticket with the same dump_stack with igc NIC.
> To fix this on the device side would lead to many other issues and we
> have to check on the device side if the calling path contains
> rtnl_lock already.

I think it's not clean that the igb/igc runtime_resume handlers call
__igb_open() before ndo_open(). I understand why it works in the
drivers, but I'd consider it a little bit hacky. And there's no
need for the drivers to acquire rtnl_lock before ndo_open().

> I still think we should not keep rtnl locked when calling functions
> outside of network stack.
>
Well, the runtime pm handlers of a MAC driver are within the network
stack. I understand that your proposed change is the easiest way to
work around the issue you're facing. I'm not sure it's the best way
however, but I don't have a strong opinion here and would leave it
to the maintainers which option they prefer.

> Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx> 於 2021年4月26日週一下午4:42寫道：
>>
>> On 26.04.2021 09:36, AceLan Kao wrote:
>>> Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx> 於 2021年4月25日週日上午4:07寫道：
>>>>
>>>> On 23.04.2021 05:42, AceLan Kao wrote:
>>>>> Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx> 於 2021年4月22日週四下午3:09寫道：
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 22.04.2021 08:30, AceLan Kao wrote:
>>>>>>> Yes, should add
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fixes: 9474933caf21 ("igb: close/suspend race in netif_device_detach")
>>>>>>> and also
>>>>>>> Fixes: 9513d2a5dc7f ("igc: Add legacy power management support")
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please don't top-post. Apart from that:
>>>>>> If the issue was introduced with driver changes, then adding a workaround
>>>>>> in net core may not be the right approach.
>>>>> It's hard to say who introduces this issue, we probably could point
>>>>> our finger to below commit
>>>>> bd869245a3dc net: core: try to runtime-resume detached device in __dev_open
>>>>>
>>>>> This calling path is not usual, in my case, the NIC is not plugged in
>>>>> any Ethernet cable,
>>>>> and we are doing networking tests on another NIC on the system. So,
>>>>> remove the rtnl lock from igb driver will affect other scenarios.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> 於 2021年4月21日週三上午3:27寫道：
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:34:17 +0200 Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:54 AM AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From: "Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)" <acelan.kao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The rtnl_lock() has been called in rtnetlink_rcv_msg(), and then in
>>>>>>>>>> __dev_open() it calls pm_runtime_resume() to resume devices, and in
>>>>>>>>>> some devices' resume function(igb_resum,igc_resume) they calls rtnl_lock()
>>>>>>>>>> again. That leads to a recursive lock.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It should leave the devices' resume function to decide if they need to
>>>>>>>>>> call rtnl_lock()/rtnl_unlock(), so call rtnl_unlock() before calling
>>>>>>>>>> pm_runtime_resume() and then call rtnl_lock() after it in __dev_open().
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Acelan
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When was the bugg added ?
>>>>>>>>> Please add a Fixes: tag
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For immediate cause probably:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fixes: 9474933caf21 ("igb: close/suspend race in netif_device_detach")
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> By doing so, you give more chances for reviewers to understand why the
>>>>>>>>> fix is not risky,
>>>>>>>>> and help stable teams work.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IMO the driver lacks internal locking. Taking 看rtnl from resume is just
>>>>>>>> one example, git history shows many more places that lacked locking and
>>>>>>>> got papered over with rtnl here.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You could alternatively try the following. It should avoid the deadlock,
>>>> and when runtime-resuming if __IGB_DOWN is set all we do is marking the
>>>> net_device as present (because of PCI D3 -> D0 transition).
>>>> I do basically the same in r8169 and it works as intended.
>>>>
>>>> Disclaimer: I don't have an igb-driven device and therefore can't test
>>>> the proposal.
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>>> index 038a9fd1a..21436626a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>>>> @@ -9300,6 +9300,14 @@ static int __maybe_unused igb_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>>>
>>>> static int __maybe_unused igb_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>>>> {
>>>> + struct net_device *netdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>>> + struct igb_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (test_bit(__IGB_DOWN, &adapter->state)) {
>>>> + netif_device_attach(netdev);
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> return igb_resume(dev);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.31.1
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Heiner,
>>>
>>> I encountered below error after applied your patch.
>>>
>> Presumably similar changes are needed also for the runtime_suspend callback.
>> If __IGB_DOWN is set, I think just the net_device needs to be detached.
>>
>>
>>> [ 121.489970] u kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> [ 121.489979] u kernel: igb 0000:05:00.0: disabling already-disabled device
>>> [ 121.490008] u kernel: WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 258 at
>>> drivers/pci/pci.c:2146 pci_disable_device+0x91/0xb0
>>> [ 121.490028] u kernel: Modules linked in: rfcomm cmac algif_hash
>>> algif_skcipher af_alg bnep btusb btrtl btbcm btintel bluetooth
>>> ecdh_generic ecc joydev input_leds inte
>>> l_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp
>>> coretemp ath10k_pci ath10k_core kvm_intel ath mac80211 kvm
>>> snd_sof_pci_intel_tgl snd_soc_acpi_intel_ma
>>> tch snd_sof_intel_hda_common nls_iso8859_1 soundwire_intel
>>> soundwire_generic_allocation soundwire_cadence soundwire_bus
>>> snd_sof_pci snd_soc_acpi snd_sof snd_soc_core snd
>>> _hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_codec_hdmi
>>> crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul snd_sof_xtensa_dsp ghash_clmulni_intel
>>> ledtrig_audio aesni_intel snd_hda_intel
>>> libarc4 crypto_simd snd_intel_dspcfg snd_intel_sdw_acpi cryptd
>>> snd_hda_codec cfg80211 mei_hdcp snd_hwdep snd_hda_core
>>> intel_wmi_thunderbolt snd_pcm wmi_bmof snd_seq inte
>>> l_cstate efi_pstore snd_timer snd_seq_device ee1004 mei_me snd mei
>>> ucsi_acpi soundcore typec_ucsi typec wmi mac_hid acpi_pad acpi_tad
>>> sch_fq_codel
>>> [ 121.490314] u kernel: parport_pc ppdev lp parport ip_tables
>>> x_tables autofs4 btrfs blake2b_generic zstd_compress raid10 raid456
>>> async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_
>>> pq async_xor async_tx libcrc32c xor raid6_pq raid1 raid0 multipath
>>> linear hid_generic usbhid hid i915 drm_kms_helper syscopyarea
>>> sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec rc
>>> _core igb drm nvme e1000e nvme_core i2c_i801 dca i2c_smbus
>>> i2c_algo_bit intel_lpss_pci intel_lpss ahci idma64 video xhci_pci
>>> libahci virt_dma xhci_pci_renesas pinctrl_ti
>>> gerlake
>>> [ 121.490508] u kernel: CPU: 7 PID: 258 Comm: kworker/7:2 Tainted: G
>>> U 5.12.0-rc7+ #79
>>> [ 121.490518] u kernel: Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 7090/, BIOS
>>> 0.12.80 02/23/2021
>>> [ 121.490525] u kernel: Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work
>>> [ 121.490540] u kernel: RIP: 0010:pci_disable_device+0x91/0xb0
>>> [ 121.490550] u kernel: Code: 4d 85 e4 75 07 4c 8b a3 c8 00 00 00 48
>>> 8d bb c8 00 00 00 e8 61 8d 17 00 4c 89 e2 48 c7 c7 60 5a e0 a5 48 89
>>> c6 e8 9b a3 59 00 <0f> 0b eb 8
>>> d 48 89 df e8 e3 fe ff ff 80 a3 49 0a 00 00 df 5b 41 5c
>>> [ 121.490558] u kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffb76b4169fc90 EFLAGS: 00010286
>>> [ 121.490569] u kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9e2581ee6000
>>> RCX: 0000000000000027
>>> [ 121.490576] u kernel: RDX: 0000000000000027 RSI: ffffffffa493bca0
>>> RDI: ffff9e27073e89b8
>>> [ 121.490582] u kernel: RBP: ffffb76b4169fca0 R08: ffff9e27073e89b0
>>> R09: 0000000000000000
>>> [ 121.490588] u kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001
>>> R12: ffff9e2581af7c80
>>> [ 121.490594] u kernel: R13: ffff9e2581ee6000 R14: ffff9e25a0914000
>>> R15: ffff9e25a0915280
>>> [ 121.490600] u kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000)
>>> GS:ffff9e2707200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>> [ 121.490608] u kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>> [ 121.490614] u kernel: CR2: 00007ff86ec8d024 CR3: 0000000189c28002
>>> CR4: 0000000000770ee0
>>> [ 121.490621] u kernel: PKRU: 55555554
>>> [ 121.490626] u kernel: Call Trace:
>>> [ 121.490638] u kernel: __igb_shutdown+0xf2/0x1c0 [igb]
>>> [ 121.490676] u kernel: igb_runtime_suspend+0x1c/0x20 [igb]
>>> [ 121.490703] u kernel: pci_pm_runtime_suspend+0x63/0x180
>>> [ 121.490715] u kernel: ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x90/0x90
>>> [ 121.490727] u kernel: __rpm_callback+0xc7/0x140
>>> [ 121.490740] u kernel: rpm_callback+0x57/0x80
>>> [ 121.490750] u kernel: ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0x90/0x90
>>> [ 121.490759] u kernel: rpm_suspend+0x119/0x640
>>> [ 121.490774] u kernel: pm_runtime_work+0x64/0xc0
>>> [ 121.490784] u kernel: process_one_work+0x2af/0x5d0
>>> [ 121.490803] u kernel: worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0
>>> [ 121.490814] u kernel: ? process_one_work+0x5d0/0x5d0
>>> [ 121.490825] u kernel: kthread+0x12a/0x160
>>> [ 121.490834] u kernel: ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
>>> [ 121.490844] u kernel: ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>>> [ 121.490867] u kernel: irq event stamp: 0[ 121.490871] u kernel:
>>> hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
>>> [ 121.490916] u kernel: hardirqs last disabled at (0):
>>> [<ffffffffa489ea44>] copy_process+0x714/0x1cc0
>>> [ 121.490929] u kernel: softirqs last enabled at (0):
>>> [<ffffffffa489ea44>] copy_process+0x714/0x1cc0
>>> [ 121.490938] u kernel: softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
>>> [ 121.490949] u kernel: ---[ end trace a9c7ffc27c226979 ]---
>>>
>>

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] uio: uio_pci_generic: add memory mappings"
Previous message: Mike Galbraith: "Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: don't use waker's cpu if the waker of sync wake-up is interrupt"
In reply to: AceLan Kao: "Re: [PATCH] net: called rtnl_unlock() before runpm resumes devices"
Next in thread: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH] net: called rtnl_unlock() before runpm resumes devices"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]