On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 03:14:31PM -0400, Thara Gopinath wrote:
On 4/28/21 2:48 PM, Ansuel Smith wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 12:47:30PM -0400, Thara Gopinath wrote:
Hi,
Please include a cover letter next time describing the patch series.
Yes sorry, I tought that for a small series (2 patch) it wasn't needed.
On 4/18/21 9:29 PM, Ansuel Smith wrote:
Simplify debugfs init function.
- Drop useless variables
- Add check for existing dev directory.
- Fix wrong version in dbg_version_show (with version 0.0.0, 0.1.0 was
incorrectly reported)
Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 16 +++++++---------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
index f9d50a67e..b086d1496 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static int dbg_version_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
return ret;
seq_printf(s, "%d.%d.%d\n", maj_ver, min_ver, step_ver);
} else {
- seq_puts(s, "0.1.0\n");
+ seq_printf(s, "0.%d.0\n", priv->feat->ver_major);
}
return 0;
@@ -704,21 +704,19 @@ DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(dbg_sensors);
static void tsens_debug_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct tsens_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- struct dentry *root, *file;
- root = debugfs_lookup("tsens", NULL);
- if (!root)
+ priv->debug_root = debugfs_lookup("tsens", NULL);
+ if (!priv->debug_root)
priv->debug_root = debugfs_create_dir("tsens", NULL);
- else
- priv->debug_root = root;
- file = debugfs_lookup("version", priv->debug_root);
- if (!file)
+ if (!debugfs_lookup("version", priv->debug_root))
debugfs_create_file("version", 0444, priv->debug_root,
pdev, &dbg_version_fops);
/* A directory for each instance of the TSENS IP */
- priv->debug = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv->debug_root);
Unconditionally creating priv->debug here is correct. The below if
(!priv->debug) will never be true because as per your patch 1, we call
tsens_debug_init once per instance of tsens.
You are right, will send a v2 if everything else is good. What do you
think?
I have not tested this yet. The clean up itself looks okay to me.
My question is have you tried this with 8960 tsens ? That is the only
version of tsens that does not use init_common and hence looks to me that a
debug interface is not created. I don't think this should be a problem
though. So if you can fix the above, it is a go ahead from me.
Recent commits should have switched 8960 to init_common. Actually I
pushed this cause while testing 8960 I notice the warning about
double debugfs. Anyway thx for the review. Will send v2 ASAP.
--
Warm Regards
Thara