Hi Reinette,
On 4/21/2021 1:37 AM, tan.shaopeng@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi,into resctrl?
Ping... any comments&advice about add an A64FX cache control function
My apologies for the delay.
capacity of the L1D&L2 cache.
Best regards
Tan Shaopeng
Hello
I'm Tan Shaopeng from Fujitsu Limited.
I’m trying to implement Fujitsu A64FX’s cache related features.
It is a cache partitioning function we called sector cache function
that using the value of the tag that is upper 8 bits of the 64bit
address and the value of the sector cache register to control virtual cache
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAK8P3a2pFcNTw9NpRtQfYr7A5Oc
A few days ago, when I sent a driver that realizes this function to
ARM64 kernel community, Will Deacon and Arnd Bergmann suggested an
idea to add the sector cache function of A64FX into resctrl.
finished.Z=As2kM0D_sbfFcGQ_J2Q+Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Based on my study, I think the sector cache function of A64FX can be
added into the allocation features of resctrl after James' resctrl rework has
need.But, in order to implement this function, more interfaces for resctrl are
The details are as follow, and could you give me some advice?
[Sector cache function]
The sector cache function split cache into multiple sectors and
control them separately. It is implemented on the L1D cache and
L2 cache in the A64FX processor and can be controlled individually
for L1D cache and L2 cache. A64FX has no L3 cache. Each L1D cache and
L2 cache has 4 sectors. Which L1D sector is used is specified by the
value of [57:56] bits of address, how many ways of sector are
specified by the value of register (IMP_SCCR_L1_EL0).
Which L2 sector is used is specified by the value of [56] bits of
address, and how many ways of sector are specified by value of
register (IMP_SCCR_ASSIGN_EL1, IMP_SCCR_SET0_L2_EL1,
IMP_SCCR_SET1_L2_EL1).
For more details of sector cache function, see A64FX HPC extension
specification (1.2. Sector cache) in https://github.com/fujitsu/A64FX
The overview in section 12 was informative but very high level.
I'm considering how to answer your questions from your email which
I received before, when I check the email again, I am sorry that
the information I provided before are insufficient.
To understand the sector cache function of A64FX, could you please see
A64FX_Microarchitecture_Manual - section 12. Sector Cache
https://github.com/fujitsu/A64FX/blob/master/doc/A64FX_Microarchitecture_Manual_en_1.4.pdf
and,
A64FX_Specification_HPC_Extension ? section 1.2. Sector Cache
https://github.com/fujitsu/A64FX/blob/master/doc/A64FX_Specification_HPC_Extension_v1_EN.pdf
In addition, Japan will be on a long holiday about one week from
April 29th, I will answer your other questions after the holidays.
I was not able to find any instance of "IMP_SCCR" in this document to explore
how this cache allocation works.
Are these cache sectors exposed to the OS in any way? For example, when the
OS discovers the cache, does it learn about these sectors and expose the
details to user space (/sys/devices/system/cpuX/cache)?
The overview of Sector Cache in that document provides details of how the size
of the sector itself is dynamically adjusted to usage. That description is quite
cryptic but it seems like a sector, since the number of ways associated with it
can dynamically change, is more equivalent to a class of service or resource
group in the resctrl environment.
I really may be interpreting things wrong here, could you perhaps point me to
where I can obtain more details?
L1:<cache_id0>=<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>;<cache_id1>=<cw[Difference between resctrl(CAT) and this sector cache function]
L2/L3 CAT (Cache Allocation Technology) enables the user to specify
some physical partition of cache space that an application can fill.
A64FX's L1D/L2 cache has 4 sectors and 16ways. This sector function
enables a user to specify number of ways each sector uses.
Therefore, for CAT it is enough to specify a cache portion for each
cache_id (socket). On the other hand, sector cache needs to specify
cache portion of each sector for each cache_id, and following
extension to resctrl interface is needed to support sector cache.
[Idear for A64FX sector cache function control interface (schemata
file details)]
L2:<cache_id0>=>=<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>;<cache_id1>=bm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>;…
each<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>;…
・L1: Add a new interface to control the L1D cache.
・<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>:Specify the number of ways for
(percentage),sector.
・cwbm:Specify the number of ways in each sector as a bitmap
resourcebut the bitmap does not indicate the location of the cache.
* In the sector cache function, L2 sector cache way setting register is
shared among PEs (Processor Element) in shared domain. If two PEs
which share L2 cache belongs to different resource groups, one
group's L2 setting will affect to other resource group's L2 setting.
In resctrl a "resource group" can be viewed as a class of service.
* Since A64FX does not support MPAM, it is not necessary to consider
how to switch between MPAM and sector cache function now.
Some questions:
1.I'm still studying about RDT, could you tell me whether RDT has
the similar mechanism with sector cache function?
This is not clear to me yet. One thing to keep in mind is that a bit in the capacity
bitmask could correspond to some number of ways in a cache, but it does not
have to. It is essentially a hint to hardware on how much cache space needs to
be allocated while also indicating overlap and isolation from other allocations.
resctrl already supports the bitmask being interpreted differently between
architectures and with the MPAM support there will be even more support for
different interpretations.
2.In RDT, L3 cache is shared among cores in socket. If two cores which
share L3 cache belongs to different resource groups, one resource
group's L3 setting will affect to other resource group's L3 setting?
This question is not entirely clear to me. Are you referring to the hardware layout
or configuration changes via the resctrl "cpus" file?
Each resource group is a class of service (CLOS) that is supported by all cache
instances. By default each resource group would thus contain all cache
instances on the system (even if some cache instances do not support the
same number of CLOS resctrl would only support the CLOS supported by all
resources).