Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: nvmem: Add bootcount-nvmem

[Nandor Han]

Hi,

Thanks for your feedback.

<snip>

> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    enum:
> > +      - linux,bootcount-nvmem
>
> What makes this Linux specific? IIRC, u-boot has boot counting function
> too.

U-Boot has indeed the counterpart functionality of bootcount feature, 
however, in this particularly case is not called `u-boot,bootcount-nvmem`.
If you have any suggestions I'm happy to change it.
Should I remove the `linux` prefix?

<snip>

> > +
> > +  linux,bootcount-magic:
> > +    description: Override default mask value.
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>
> I don't understand what this is. Is it magic or a mask?

It's the magic value. Seems to be a mistake in the description.
I'll correct this.

> > +
> > +dependencies:
> > +  nvmem-cell-names: [ nvmem-cells ]
>
> Core schema takes care of this.

Ok. I will remove it in that case.

<snip>

> > +examples:
> > +  # example with 16 bit nvram cell:
> > +  - |
> > +    bootcount {
> > +        compatible = "linux,bootcount-nvmem";
> > +        nvmem-cells = <&bootcount_regs>;
> > +        nvmem-cell-names = "bootcount-regs";
> > +    };
> > +
> > +    rtc: rtc@68 {
> > +        bootcount_regs: bootcount_nvmem_regs@e {
> > +            reg = <0x0e 0x2>;
>
> It would be simpler to just add a compatible here and get rid of the
> 'bootcount' node here.

This is the configuration for NVMEM cell provider and is done according 
to bindings/nvmem.yaml document.
Is here something that I'm missing?

At least this method of declaring NVMEM cells providers are decoupling 
the code from hardware declaration resulting in a more robust code.

Regards,
   Nandor