Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] libbpf: Fix signed overflow in ringbuf_process_ring
From: Andrii Nakryiko
Date: Fri Apr 30 2021 - 12:31:52 EST
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 6:05 AM Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> One of our benchmarks running in (Google-internal) CI pushes data
> through the ringbuf faster htan than userspace is able to consume
> it. In this case it seems we're actually able to get >INT_MAX entries
> in a single ringbuf_buffer__consume call. ASAN detected that cnt
> overflows in this case.
>
> Fix by using 64-bit counter internally and then capping the result to
> INT_MAX before converting to the int return type.
>
> Fixes: bf99c936f947 (libbpf: Add BPF ring buffer support)
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> diff v1->v2: Now we don't break the loop at INT_MAX, we just cap the reported
> entry count.
>
> Note: I feel a bit guilty about the fact that this makes the reader
> think about implicit conversions. Nobody likes thinking about that.
>
> But explicit casts don't really help with clarity:
>
> return (int)min(cnt, (int64_t)INT_MAX); // ugh
>
I'd go with
if (cnt > INT_MAX)
return INT_MAX;
return cnt;
If you don't mind, I can patch it up while applying?
> shrug..
>
> tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c
> index e7a8d847161f..2e114c2d0047 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c
> @@ -204,7 +204,9 @@ static inline int roundup_len(__u32 len)
>
> static int ringbuf_process_ring(struct ring* r)
> {
> - int *len_ptr, len, err, cnt = 0;
> + int *len_ptr, len, err;
> + /* 64-bit to avoid overflow in case of extreme application behavior */
> + int64_t cnt = 0;
> unsigned long cons_pos, prod_pos;
> bool got_new_data;
> void *sample;
> @@ -240,7 +242,7 @@ static int ringbuf_process_ring(struct ring* r)
> }
> } while (got_new_data);
> done:
> - return cnt;
> + return min(cnt, INT_MAX);
> }
>
> /* Consume available ring buffer(s) data without event polling.
> @@ -263,8 +265,8 @@ int ring_buffer__consume(struct ring_buffer *rb)
> }
>
> /* Poll for available data and consume records, if any are available.
> - * Returns number of records consumed, or negative number, if any of the
> - * registered callbacks returned error.
> + * Returns number of records consumed (or INT_MAX, whichever is less), or
> + * negative number, if any of the registered callbacks returned error.
> */
> int ring_buffer__poll(struct ring_buffer *rb, int timeout_ms)
> {
> --
> 2.31.1.498.g6c1eba8ee3d-goog
>