Re: [PATCH] eventfd: convert to using ->write_iter()

[Jens Axboe]

On 5/3/21 10:12 AM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Jens Axboe
>> Sent: 03 May 2021 15:58
>>
>> Had a report on writing to eventfd with io_uring is slower than it
>> should be, and it's the usual case of if a file type doesn't support
>> ->write_iter(), then io_uring cannot rely on IOCB_NOWAIT being honored
>> alongside O_NONBLOCK for whether or not this is a non-blocking write
>> attempt. That means io_uring will punt the operation to an io thread,
>> which will slow us down unnecessarily.
>>
>> Convert eventfd to using fops->write_iter() instead of fops->write().
> 
> Won't this have a measurable performance degradation on normal
> code that does write(event_fd, &one, 4);

If ->write_iter() or ->read_iter() is much slower than the non-iov
versions, then I think we have generic issues that should be solved.
That should not be a consideration, since the non-iov ones are
legacy and should not be adopted in new code.

-- 
Jens Axboe