Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:21:53AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> v6 -- Added new commit which adds a missing function to the reset API.
>       This fixes 557acb3d2cd9 and should be destined for linux stable.
> 
> v5 -- Improved (I hope) commit description (Bjorn).
>    -- Rnamed error labels (Krzyszt).
>    -- Fixed typos.
> 
> v4 -- does not rely on a pending commit, unlike v3.
> 
> v3 -- discard commit from v2; instead rely on the new function
>       reset_control_rearm provided in a recent commit [1] applied
>       to reset/next.
>    -- New commit to correct pcie-brcmstb.c usage of a reset controller
>       to use reset/rearm verses deassert/assert.
> 
> v2 -- refactor rescal-reset driver to implement assert/deassert rather than
>       reset because the reset call only fires once per lifetime and we need
>       to reset after every resume from S2 or S3.
>    -- Split the use of "ahci" and "rescal" controllers in separate fields
>       to keep things simple.
> 
> v1 -- original
> 
> Jim Quinlan (3):
>   reset: add missing empty function reset_control_rearm()
>   ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller
>   PCI: brcmstb: Use reset/rearm instead of deassert/assert
> 
>  drivers/ata/ahci_brcm.c               | 46 +++++++++++++--------------
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 19 +++++++----
>  include/linux/reset.h                 |  5 +++
>  3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

I provisionally applied these to my pci/brcmstb branch for v5.13.

I carried forward Jens' ack on "ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216
reset controller" since the patch is identical to the v5 version that
he acked.

I'm hoping to get an ack from Philipp for the reset.h change.

Bjorn