Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] sched/fair: find_energy_efficient_cpu() enhancements

[Pierre Gondois]

Hi Xuewen,

Please let me know if you have some comments,
Pierre

On 5/4/21 10:07 AM, Pierre Gondois wrote:
> V2:
>   - Split the patch in 2. [Quentin]
>   - Add testing results to the cover-letter. [Dietmar]
>   - Put back 'rcu_read_unlock()' to unlock the rcu
>     earlier. [Dietmar]
>   - Various comments. [Dietmar/Quentin]
>
> V3:
>   - Layout/phrasing. [Dietmar]
>
> This patchset prevents underflows in find_energy_efficient_cpu().
> This is done in the second patch:
> sched/fair: Fix negative energy delta in find_energy_efficient_cpu()
>
> The first patch:
> sched/fair: Only compute base_energy_pd if necessary
> prevents an unnecessary call to compute_energy() if no CPU is available
> in a performance domain (pd).
> When looping over the pds, it also allows to gather the calls
> to compute_energy(), reducing the chances of having utilization signals
> being concurrently updated and having a 'negative delta'.
>
> The energy tests of the initial EAS enablement at:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181203095628.11858-1-quentin.perret@xxxxxxx
> have been executed using LISA on a Juno-r2 (2xA57 + 4xA53).
>
> To recall the test:
> "10 iterations of between 10 and 50 periodic rt-app tasks (16ms period,
> 5% duty-cycle) for 30 seconds with energy measurement. Unit is Joules.
> The goal is to save energy, so lower is better."
> "Energy is measured with the onboard energy meter. Numbers include
> consumption of big and little CPUs."
>
> +----------+-----------------+-------------------------+
> |          | Without patches | With patches            |
> +----------+--------+--------+------------------+------+
> | Tasks nb |  Mean  |    CI* | Mean             |  CI* |
> +----------+--------+--------+------------------+------+
> |       10 |   6.57 |   0.24 |   6.46 (-1.63%)  | 0.27 |
> |       20 |  12.44 |   0.21 |  12.44 (-0.01%)  | 0.14 |
> |       30 |  19.10 |   0.78 |  18.75 (-1.85%)  | 0.15 |
> |       40 |  27.27 |   0.53 |  27.35 (+0.31%)  | 0.33 |
> |       50 |  36.55 |   0.42 |  36.28 (-0.74%)  | 0.42 |
> +----------+-----------------+-------------------------+
> CI: confidence interval
>
> For each line, the intervals of values w/ w/o the patches are
> overlapping (consider Mean +/- CI). Thus, the energy results shouldn't
> have been impacted.
>
> Pierre Gondois (2):
>    sched/fair: Only compute base_energy_pd if necessary
>    sched/fair: Fix negative energy delta in find_energy_efficient_cpu()
>
>   kernel/sched/fair.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>   1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)