Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] MT7530 interrupt support

[Landen Chao]

On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 18:34 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > mhm, maybe the naming should differ if generic phy and net-phy are
> > that different. i guess there is no way to merge the net phys to
> > the
> > generic phys (due to linking to the net device drivers) to have
> > only
> > 1 phy section, right?
> 
> phys and generic PHYs are very different things, completely different
> API etc. They cannot be merged.
> 
> > but if phy- prefix is used by generic phys, maybe eth- or net- can
> > be used here (maybe with "phy" added)
> > 
> > something like
> > 
> > eth-phy-mt753x.ko
How about using mediatek-ge.ko. 'ge' is the abbreviation of gigabit
Ethernet. Most mediatek products use the same gigabit Ethernet phy.

Landen
> > 
> > else i have no idea now...my patch renaming the musb-module seems
> > not
> > to be accepted due to possible breakage
> 
> The usb module has been around for a long time, so it cannot be
> changed. The phy driver is new, not in a released kernel. So we can
> still rename it without causing problems.
> 
> I still want to understand the naming here. If you look at most
> Ethernet switches with integrated PHYs, the PHYs have their own
> naming
> scheme, separate from the switch, because they are independent IP. So
> i would prefer this driver by named after the PHY name, not the
> switch
> name. That might solve the naming conflict, mt123x for the PHY,
> mt7530
> for the switch driver.
> 
> 	Andrew