On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 2:00 AM John Garry<john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 06/05/2021 23:56, Ian Rogers wrote:I thought about just dropping the print in the json case but then a
json files in the level 1 directory are used for ArchStd events (seeWe could get more elaborate and add the same first debug print in
preprocess_arch_std_files), as such they shouldn't be warned about.
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers<irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c b/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
index ed4f0bd72e5a..7422b0ea8790 100644
--- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
+++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
@@ -1123,8 +1123,10 @@ static int process_one_file(const char *fpath, const struct stat *sb,
mapfile = strdup(fpath);
return 0;
}
-
- pr_info("%s: Ignoring file %s\n", prog, fpath);
+ if (is_json_file(bname))
+ pr_debug("%s: ArchStd json is preprocessed %s\n", prog, fpath)
process_one_file() to preprocess_arch_std_file() to give the allusion
that they are preprocessed, and change the logic not print that for arch
std files (in process_one_file()). But not sure it's worth it.
Or else we could also just omit any print here for archstd files here.
comment would be nice, the pr_debug is a comment and is somewhat
intention revealing. If you think it is overkill then it is ok to
change.