Re: [PATCH] perf jevents: Silence warning for ArchStd files
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Sat May 08 2021 - 10:24:52 EST
Em Fri, May 07, 2021 at 05:29:06PM +0100, John Garry escreveu:
> On 07/05/2021 16:46, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 2:00 AM John Garry<john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On 06/05/2021 23:56, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > > json files in the level 1 directory are used for ArchStd events (see
> > > > preprocess_arch_std_files), as such they shouldn't be warned about.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers<irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c | 6 ++++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c b/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
> > > > index ed4f0bd72e5a..7422b0ea8790 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c
> > > > @@ -1123,8 +1123,10 @@ static int process_one_file(const char *fpath, const struct stat *sb,
> > > > mapfile = strdup(fpath);
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > -
> > > > - pr_info("%s: Ignoring file %s\n", prog, fpath);
> > > > + if (is_json_file(bname))
> > > > + pr_debug("%s: ArchStd json is preprocessed %s\n", prog, fpath)
> > > We could get more elaborate and add the same first debug print in
> > > process_one_file() to preprocess_arch_std_file() to give the allusion
> > > that they are preprocessed, and change the logic not print that for arch
> > > std files (in process_one_file()). But not sure it's worth it.
> > >
> > > Or else we could also just omit any print here for archstd files here.
> > I thought about just dropping the print in the json case but then a
> > comment would be nice, the pr_debug is a comment and is somewhat
> > intention revealing. If you think it is overkill then it is ok to
> > change.
>
> I don't think it's a big deal either way.
>
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo