Question about device link//Re: Qestion about device link

From: chenxiang (M)
Date: Tue May 11 2021 - 06:42:51 EST


Re-edit the non-aligned flowchart and add CC to Greg-KH and Saravanna.


在 2021/5/11 11:59, chenxiang (M) 写道:
Hi Rafael and other guys,

I am trying to add a device link between scsi_host->shost_gendev and hisi_hba->dev to support runtime PM for hisi_hba driver

(as it supports runtime PM for scsi host in some scenarios such as error handler etc, we can avoid to do them again if adding a

device link between scsi_host->shost_gendev and hisi_hba->dev) as follows (hisi_sas driver is under directory drivers/scsi/hisi_sas):

device_link_add(&shost->shost_gendev, hisi_hba->dev, DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE)

We have a full test on it, and it works well except when rmmod the driver, some call trace occurs as follows:

[root@localhost ~]# rmmod hisi_sas_v3_hw
[ 105.377944] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/113:1/811/0x00000201
[ 105.384469] Modules linked in: bluetooth rfkill ib_isert iscsi_target_mod ib_ipoib ib_umad iptable_filter vfio_iommu_type1 vfio_pci vfio_virqfd vfio rpcrdma ib_is er libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi crct10dif_ce sbsa_gwdt hns_roce_hw_v2 hisi_sec2 hisi_hpre hisi_zip hisi_qm uacce spi_hisi_sfc_v3xx hisi_trng_v2 rng_core hisi_uncore _hha_pmu hisi_uncore_ddrc_pmu hisi_uncore_l3c_pmu spi_dw_mmio hisi_uncore_pmu hns3 hclge hnae3 hisi_sas_v3_hw(-) hisi_sas_main libsas
[ 105.424841] CPU: 113 PID: 811 Comm: kworker/113:1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 5.12.0-rc1+ #1
[ 105.434454] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDC, BIOS 2280-V2 CS V5.B143.01 04/22/2021
[ 105.443287] Workqueue: rcu_gp srcu_invoke_callbacks
[ 105.448154] Call trace:
[ 105.450593] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1a4
[ 105.454245] show_stack+0x24/0x40
[ 105.457548] dump_stack+0xc8/0x104
[ 105.460939] __schedule_bug+0x68/0x80
[ 105.464590] __schedule+0x73c/0x77c
[ 105.465700] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/96:1/791/0x00000201
[ 105.468066] schedule+0x7c/0x110
[ 105.468068] schedule_timeout+0x194/0x1d4
[ 105.474490] Modules linked in:
[ 105.477692] wait_for_completion+0x8c/0x12c
[ 105.477695] rcu_barrier+0x1e0/0x2fc
[ 105.477697] scsi_host_dev_release+0x50/0xf0
[ 105.477701] device_release+0x40/0xa0
[ 105.477704] kobject_put+0xac/0x100
[ 105.477707] __device_link_free_srcu+0x50/0x74
[ 105.477709] srcu_invoke_callbacks+0x108/0x1a4
[ 105.484743] process_one_work+0x1dc/0x48c
[ 105.492468] worker_thread+0x7c/0x464
[ 105.492471] kthread+0x168/0x16c
[ 105.492473] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
...

After analyse the process, we find that it will device_del(&shost->gendev) in function scsi_remove_host() and then

put_device(&shost->shost_gendev) in function scsi_host_put() when removing the driver, if there is a link between shost and hisi_hba->dev,

it will try to delete the link in device_del(), and also will call_srcu(__device_link_free_srcu) to put_device() link->consumer and supplier.

But if put device() for shost_gendev in device_link_free() is later than in scsi_host_put(), it will call scsi_host_dev_release() in

srcu_invoke_callbacks() while it is atomic and there are scheduling in scsi_host_dev_release(),

so it reports the BUG "scheduling while atomic:...".

thread 1 thread2
hisi_sas_v3_remove
...
sas_remove_host()
...
scsi_remove_host()
...
device_del(&shost->shost_gendev)
...
device_link_purge()
__device_link_del()
device_unregister(&link->link_dev)
devlink_dev_release
call_srcu(__device_link_free_srcu) -----------> srcu_invoke_callbacks (atomic)
__device_link_free_srcu
...
scsi_host_put()
put_device(&shost->shost_gendev) (ref = 1)
device_link_free()
put_device(link->consumer) //shost->gendev ref = 0
...
scsi_host_dev_release
...
rcu_barrier
kthread_stop()

Re-edit the non-aligned flowchart
thread 1 thread 2
hisi_sas_v3_remove()
...
sas_remove_host()
...
device_del(&shost->shost_gendev)
...
device_link_purge()
__device_link_del()
device_unregister(&link->link_dev)
devlink_dev_release
call_srcu(__device_link_free_srcu) -----------> srcu_invoke_callbacks (atomic)
__device_link_free_srcu()
...
scsi_host_put()
put_device(&shost->shost_gendev) (ref = 1)
device_link_free()
put_device(link->consumer) //shost->gendev ref = 0
...
scsi_host_dev_release()
...
rcu_barrier()
kthread_stop()



We can check kref of shost->shost_gendev to make sure scsi_host_put() to release scsi host device in LLDD driver to avoid the issue,

but it seems be a common issue: function __device_link_free_srcu calls put_device() for consumer and supplier,

but if it's ref =0 at that time and there are scheduling or sleep in dev_release, it may have the issue.

Do you have any idea about the issue?


Best regards,

Xiang Chen



.