Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/vmalloc: Print a warning message first on failure

From: Uladzislau Rezki
Date: Tue May 11 2021 - 08:43:09 EST


On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 02:58:18AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 06:52:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 May 2021 12:33:42 +0200 Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Please find the v4 version of the patch that is in question:
> > >
> > > >From 7e27e4ac8f299ae244e9e0e90e0292ae2c08d37d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 23:41:21 +0200
> > > Subject: [PATCH v4 1/1] mm/vmalloc: Print a warning message first on failure
> >
> > Added, thanks.
> >
> > Matthew has a point of course, but I do think that any console driver
> > which tries to allocate memory within the cotext of printk() is so
> > pathetic that it isn't worth compromising core code to cater for it...
>
> I'm fine with v4 of this patch, fwiw. I saw no advantage to the earlier
> version, but now that the advantage has been explained, the advantage
> outweighs the disadvantage.

Thanks!

The point about an extra memory for printk is correct. From the other
hand i am not able to recall issues related to lack of memory for
printk() to emit a message. At least on our mobile devices i have not
seen such scenarios.

--
Vlad Rezki