Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 7/7] x86/entry: use int for syscall number; handle all invalid syscall nrs

[H. Peter Anvin]

Yes, indeed. I hope my reply to Ingo clarifies it as I'm going to try to wordsmith that into a better piece of text.

On May 12, 2021 3:22:05 PM PDT, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Wed, May 12 2021 at 15:09, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 5/12/21 11:34 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That is intentional, as (again) system calls are int.
>>> 
>>> They are 'int' kernel internally, but _NOT_ at the user space
>visible
>>> side. Again: man syscall
>>> 
>>>      syscall(long number,...);
>>> 
>>> So that results in a user ABI change.
>>> 
>>>> As stated in my reply to Ingo, I'll clean the various descriptions
>and
>>>> try to capture the discussion better.
>>> 
>>> If we agree to go there then this wants to be a seperate commit
>which
>>> does nothing else than changing this behaviour.
>>> 
>>
>> Good idea.
>>
>> As far as this being a user ABI change, this is actually a revert to
>the 
>> original x86-64 ABI; see my message to Ingo.
>
>I'm not against that change, but it has to be well justified and the
>reasoning wants to be in the changelog. You know the drill :)
>
>Thanks,
>
>        tglx

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.