Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] intel_gna: add a 'misc' device

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Thu May 13 2021 - 07:18:33 EST


On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 01:00:38PM +0200, Maciej Kwapulinski wrote:
> The new 'misc' device is the node for applications in user space to
> interact with the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Kwapulinski <maciej.kwapulinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Savo Novakovic <savox.novakovic@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/misc/intel/gna/device.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/misc/intel/gna/device.h | 11 +++----
> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/intel/gna/device.c b/drivers/misc/intel/gna/device.c
> index 0e31b8c6bb70..1e6345a8325b 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/intel/gna/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/intel/gna/device.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,18 @@ module_param(recovery_timeout, int, 0644);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(recovery_timeout, "Recovery timeout in seconds");
> #endif
>
> +struct file;
> +
> +static int gna_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
> +{
> + return -EPERM;
> +}

That sucks, why have an open that does nothing but fail?

> +
> +static const struct file_operations gna_file_ops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .open = gna_open,
> +};
> +
> static void gna_devm_idr_destroy(void *data)
> {
> struct idr *idr = data;
> @@ -27,6 +39,36 @@ static void gna_devm_idr_destroy(void *data)
> idr_destroy(idr);
> }
>
> +static void gna_devm_deregister_misc_dev(void *data)

Why is this a void *?

This isn't windows, use real pointer types everywhere in the kernel
please.

> +{
> + struct miscdevice *misc = data;
> +
> + misc_deregister(misc);
> +}
> +
> +static int gna_devm_register_misc_dev(struct device *parent, struct miscdevice *misc)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = misc_register(misc);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(parent, "misc device %s registering failed. errcode: %d\n",
> + misc->name, ret);
> + gna_devm_deregister_misc_dev(misc);
> + } else {
> + dev_dbg(parent, "device: %s registered\n",
> + misc->name);

You have loads of debugging in this driver still, is it really needed?

> + }
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action(parent, gna_devm_deregister_misc_dev, misc);

Why do you need this?


thanks,

greg k-h