Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt8183: add cbas node under cros_ec

[Ikjoon Jang]

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 4:55 PM Enric Balletbo i Serra
<enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Ikjoon,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On 13/5/21 3:45, Ikjoon Jang wrote:
> > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:38 AM Matthias Brugger
> > <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Ikjoon,
> >>
> >> On 10/05/2021 11:26, Ikjoon Jang wrote:
> >>> Add a 'cbas' device node for supporting table mode switch in
> >
> > tablet
> >
> >>> kukui devices.
> >>>
> >>> Kukui platforms with detacheable base have an additional input
> >>> device under cros-ec, which reports SW_TABLET_MODE regarding
> >>> its base state (e.g. base flipped or detached).
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi | 4 ++++
> >>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi
> >>> index ff56bcfa3370..40030ed48854 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi
> >>> @@ -816,6 +816,10 @@ usbc_extcon: extcon0 {
> >>>                       compatible = "google,extcon-usbc-cros-ec";
> >>>                       google,usb-port-id = <0>;
> >>>               };
> >>> +
> >>> +             base_detection: cbas {
>
>
> This should be just cbas, remove base_detection. It was a bit confusing follow
> these series. If [v5, 2/2] is already applied in hid tree, I'd suggest send a v7
> version including:
>
> [v7, 1/2] mfd: google,cros-ec: add DT bindings for a baseboard's switch device
> [v7, 2/2] arm64: dts: mt8183: add cbas node under cros_ec

sure, let me upload v7 with dt-bindings + mt8183.dtsi together.

>
> Both patches can go through the Matthias tree, but the first one also needs an
> Ack from Lee Jones, MFD maintainer, which I think is not cc'ied, so unlikely to
> give you the needed ack.

Oops.. :-S
(Why did I think this should go through hid?)
Thanks a lot for pointing out the basic but critical mistake.

>
> Thanks,
>   Enric
>
>
> >>> +                     compatible = "google,cros-cbas";
> >>
> >> I'm not able to find any binding description for this. It seems linux-next has
> >> driver binding to this compatible, but the description is missing.
> >>
> >> Can you please clarify.
> >
> > Yep, that's correct.
> > Let me resend this with v2 after the dt-binding patch is applied.
> >
> > In this series, I requested queueing these to hid tree:
> >
> > [v5, 1/2] mfd: google,cros-ec: add DT bindings for a baseboard's switch device
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-input/patch/20210415032958.740233-2-ikjn@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > [v5, 2/2] HID: google: Add of_match table to Whiskers switch device.
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-input/patch/20210415032958.740233-3-ikjn@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Later I found that I missed a comment from [v5, 1/2]
> > But only [v5, 2/2] part is already applied to hid tree as I asked for it.
> >
> > I sent a v6 dt-binding patch is here (not yet applied)
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-input/patch/20210512100832.3878138-1-ikjn@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mathias
> >>
> >>> +             };
> >>>       };
> >>>  };
> >>>
> >>>