Re: [PATCH 26/94] Maple Tree: Add new data structure
From: Liam Howlett
Date: Fri May 14 2021 - 17:44:08 EST
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [210514 11:32]:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 03:36:02PM +0000, Liam Howlett wrote:
> > +enum maple_type {
> > + maple_dense,
> > + maple_leaf_64,
> > + maple_range_64,
> > + maple_arange_64,
> > +};
>
> > +static inline unsigned long *ma_pivots(struct maple_node *node,
> > + enum maple_type type)
> > +{
> > + switch (type) {
> > + case maple_arange_64:
> > + return node->ma64.pivot;
> > + case maple_range_64:
> > + case maple_leaf_64:
> > + return node->mr64.pivot;
> > + case maple_dense:
> > + default:
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +}
>
> > +static inline unsigned long *ma_gaps(struct maple_node *node,
> > + enum maple_type type)
> > +{
> > + switch (type) {
> > + case maple_arange_64:
> > + return node->ma64.gap;
> > + case maple_range_64:
> > + case maple_leaf_64:
> > + case maple_dense:
> > + default:
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +}
>
> > +static inline unsigned long mte_pivot(const struct maple_enode *mn,
> > + unsigned char piv)
> > +{
> > + struct maple_node *node = mte_to_node(mn);
> > +
> > + switch (mte_node_type(mn)) {
> > + case maple_arange_64:
> > + return node->ma64.pivot[piv];
> > + case maple_range_64:
> > + case maple_leaf_64:
> > + return node->mr64.pivot[piv];
> > + case maple_dense:
> > + default:
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +}
>
> I would suggest removing the default: case. Without it the cases are
> complete and the compiler should not complain. Then if you extend the
> enum and forget to add a case, the switch is no longer complete and will
> trigger a warning, forcing you to update it (hopefully correct).
>
> If you have the default, you'll not get a warning and it'll do whatever.
Thanks, I will do this.