Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Remove redundant initialization of 'to_add'

[Lukas Bulwahn]

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:24 AM Yang Li <yang.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Variable 'to_add' is being initialized however this value is never
> read as 'to_add' is assigned a new value in if statement. Remove the
> redundant assignment. At the same time, move its declaration into the
> if statement, because the variable is not used elsewhere.
>
> Clean up clang warning:
>
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2773:8: warning: Value stored to 'to_add' during
> its initialization is never read [clang-analyzer-deadcode.DeadStores]
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index f1d15b6..e7b2289 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -2774,10 +2774,10 @@ static int unpin_extent_range(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>                 spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
>                 if (!readonly && return_free_space &&
>                     global_rsv->space_info == space_info) {
> -                       u64 to_add = len;
>
>                         spin_lock(&global_rsv->lock);
>                         if (!global_rsv->full) {
> +                               u64 to_add;
>                                 to_add = min(len, global_rsv->size -
>                                              global_rsv->reserved);

Yang Li, you could just combine these two lines above, right?

So:
u64 to_add = min(len, ...);

By the way, great contribution on addressing all those dead stores
identified by clang analyzer... I wish I would also have more time on
addressing some of those remaining...

Lukas