Re: [PATCH v13 0/4] drm/panfrost: Add support for mt8183 GPU

From: Neil Armstrong
Date: Mon May 17 2021 - 06:24:58 EST


On 14/05/2021 17:27, Steven Price wrote:
> On 14/05/2021 15:48, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> On 13/05/2021 16:55, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>>> Hi Neil,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 06:59, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 21/04/2021 07:28, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>> This is just a rebase of the v11, untested (but it seems like
>>>>> Neil Armstrong recently tested it), with small changes in
>>>>> binding and dts. v11 cover follows:
>>>>>
>>>>> Follow-up on the v5 [1], things have gotten significantly
>>>>> better in the last year, thanks to the efforts on Bifrost
>>>>> support by the Collabora team (and probably others I'm not
>>>>> aware of).
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been testing this series on a MT8183/kukui device, with a
>>>>> chromeos-5.10 kernel [2], and got basic Chromium OS UI up with
>>>>> mesa 20.3.2 (lots of artifacts though).
>>>>>
>>>>> devfreq is currently not supported, as we'll need:
>>>>> - Clock core support for switching the GPU core clock (see 2/4).
>>>>> - Platform-specific handling of the 2-regulator (see 3/4).
>>>>>
>>>>> Since the latter is easy to detect, patch 3/4 just disables
>>>>> devfreq if the more than one regulator is specified in the
>>>>> compatible matching table.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/cover/20200306041345.259332-1-drinkcat@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>>>> [2] https://crrev.com/c/2608070
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v13:
>>>>> - devfreq: Fix conflict resolution mistake when rebasing, didn't
>>>>> even compile. Oops.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v12:
>>>>> - binding: Fix min/maxItems logic (Rob Herring)
>>>>> - Add gpu node to mt8183-pumpkin.dts as well (Neil Armstrong).
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v11:
>>>>> - binding: power-domain-names not power-domainS-names
>>>>> - mt8183*.dts: remove incorrect supply-names
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v10:
>>>>> - Fix the binding to make sure sram-supply property can be provided.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v9:
>>>>> - Explain why devfreq needs to be disabled for GPUs with >1
>>>>> regulators.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v8:
>>>>> - Use DRM_DEV_INFO instead of ERROR
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v7:
>>>>> - Fix GPU ID in commit message
>>>>> - Fix GPU ID in commit message
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v6:
>>>>> - Rebased, actually tested with recent mesa driver.
>>>>> - Add gpu regulators to kukui dtsi as well.
>>>>> - Power domains are now attached to spm, not scpsys
>>>>> - Drop R-B.
>>>>> - devfreq: New change
>>>>> - Context conflicts, reflow the code.
>>>>> - Use ARRAY_SIZE for power domains too.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v5:
>>>>> - Rename "2d" power domain to "core2"
>>>>> - Rename "2d" power domain to "core2" (keep R-B again).
>>>>> - Change power domain name from 2d to core2.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>>> - Add power-domain-names description
>>>>> (kept Alyssa's reviewed-by as the change is minor)
>>>>> - Add power-domain-names to describe the 3 domains.
>>>>> (kept Alyssa's reviewed-by as the change is minor)
>>>>> - Add power domain names.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>>> - Match mt8183-mali instead of bifrost, as we require special
>>>>> handling for the 2 regulators and 3 power domains.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>> - Use sram instead of mali_sram as SRAM supply name.
>>>>> - Rename mali@ to gpu@.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nicolas Boichat (4):
>>>>> dt-bindings: gpu: mali-bifrost: Add Mediatek MT8183
>>>>> arm64: dts: mt8183: Add node for the Mali GPU
>>>>> drm/panfrost: devfreq: Disable devfreq when num_supplies > 1
>>>>> drm/panfrost: Add mt8183-mali compatible string
>>>>>
>>>>> .../bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml | 30 ++++-
>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-evb.dts | 5 +
>>>>> .../arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui.dtsi | 5 +
>>>>> .../boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-pumpkin.dts | 5 +
>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi | 105 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c | 9 ++
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c | 10 ++
>>>>> 7 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Seems this version is ready to be applied if we get a review on the DT ?
>>>>
>>>> Mathias ? could you have a look ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Given Rob has Acked the DT bindings, I think it's OK to apply patches
>>> 1, 3 and 4 via drm-misc, letting Mediatek people sort out the DT changes.
>>>
>>> My two unsolicited cents :-)
>
> You make a convincing point - and if everyone is happy for the DT
> changes to be handled separately I don't see a reason for the other
> patches to be held up.
>
>> Yeah sure, is there a panfrost maintainer in the room ? I can apply them if you ack me.
>
> I seem to be applying most Panfrost changes these days, so I'll save you
> the effort and push 1,3,4 to drm-misc-next.

Thanks !

Neil

>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>