On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 01:29:30PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote:
Hi,
Almost two months later,
Since you're committer it's expected that you go actively out to look for
review or trade with someone else who has some patches that need a quick
look. It will not happen automatically, this is on you.
Also generally after 2 weeks the patch is lost and you need to ping it.
-Daniel
Le mar., mars 23 2021 at 14:40:08 +0000, Paul Cercueil
<paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> When using a 24-bit panel on a 8-bit serial bus, the pixel clock
> requested by the panel has to be multiplied by 3, since the subpixels
> are shifted sequentially.
>
> The code (in ingenic_drm_encoder_atomic_check) already computed
> crtc_state->adjusted_mode->crtc_clock accordingly, but clk_set_rate()
> used crtc_state->adjusted_mode->clock instead.
>
> Fixes: 28ab7d35b6e0 ("drm/ingenic: Properly compute timings when using a
> 3x8-bit panel")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v5.10
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Can I get an ACK for my patch?
Thanks!
-Paul
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c
> index d60e1eefc9d1..cba68bf52ec5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ingenic/ingenic-drm-drv.c
> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static void ingenic_drm_crtc_atomic_flush(struct
> drm_crtc *crtc,
> if (priv->update_clk_rate) {
> mutex_lock(&priv->clk_mutex);
> clk_set_rate(priv->pix_clk,
> - crtc_state->adjusted_mode.clock * 1000);
> + crtc_state->adjusted_mode.crtc_clock * 1000);
> priv->update_clk_rate = false;
> mutex_unlock(&priv->clk_mutex);
> }
> --
> 2.30.2
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch