Re: [PATCH RESEND][next] net: netrom: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

From: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Date: Mon May 17 2021 - 16:32:39 EST


Hi Dave,

I haven't received any feedback about these patches after resending them.

We had thousands of these warnings and now we are down to less than a hundred in
linux-next. I'm planning to take these patches in my -next tree for 5.14 as
I'm planning to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang for that release, too.

Are you OK with this?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 4/20/21 15:11, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
>
> On 3/5/21 03:22, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
>> warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of
>> letting the code fall through to the next case.
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> net/netrom/nr_route.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/netrom/nr_route.c b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
>> index 78da5eab252a..de9821b6a62a 100644
>> --- a/net/netrom/nr_route.c
>> +++ b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
>> @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic,
>> fallthrough;
>> case 2:
>> re_sort_routes(nr_node, 0, 1);
>> + break;
>> case 1:
>> break;
>> }
>> @@ -359,6 +360,7 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n
>> fallthrough;
>> case 1:
>> nr_node->routes[1] = nr_node->routes[2];
>> + break;
>> case 2:
>> break;
>> }
>> @@ -482,6 +484,7 @@ static int nr_dec_obs(void)
>> fallthrough;
>> case 1:
>> s->routes[1] = s->routes[2];
>> + break;
>> case 2:
>> break;
>> }
>> @@ -529,6 +532,7 @@ void nr_rt_device_down(struct net_device *dev)
>> fallthrough;
>> case 1:
>> t->routes[1] = t->routes[2];
>> + break;
>> case 2:
>> break;
>> }
>>