[patch 4/8] perf/arm-dmc620: Use irq_set_affinity()
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Tue May 18 2021 - 05:33:23 EST
The driver uses irq_set_affinity_hint() to set the affinity for the PMU
interrupts, which relies on the undocumented side effect that this function
actually sets the affinity under the hood.
Setting an hint is clearly not a guarantee and for these PMU interrupts an
affinity hint, which is supposed to guide userspace for setting affinity,
is beyond pointless, because the affinity of these interrupts cannot be
modified from user space.
Aside of that the error checks are bogus because the only error which is
returned from irq_set_affinity_hint() is when there is no irq descriptor
for the interrupt number, but not when the affinity set fails. That's on
purpose because the hint can point to an offline CPU.
Replace the mindless abuse with irq_set_affinity().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
drivers/perf/arm_dmc620_pmu.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_dmc620_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_dmc620_pmu.c
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static struct dmc620_pmu_irq *__dmc620_p
if (ret)
goto out_free_aff;
- ret = irq_set_affinity_hint(irq_num, cpumask_of(irq->cpu));
+ ret = irq_set_affinity(irq_num, cpumask_of(irq->cpu));
if (ret)
goto out_free_irq;
@@ -475,7 +475,6 @@ static void dmc620_pmu_put_irq(struct dm
list_del(&irq->irqs_node);
mutex_unlock(&dmc620_pmu_irqs_lock);
- WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity_hint(irq->irq_num, NULL));
free_irq(irq->irq_num, irq);
cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(cpuhp_state_num, &irq->node);
kfree(irq);
@@ -622,7 +621,7 @@ static int dmc620_pmu_cpu_teardown(unsig
perf_pmu_migrate_context(&dmc620_pmu->pmu, irq->cpu, target);
mutex_unlock(&dmc620_pmu_irqs_lock);
- WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity_hint(irq->irq_num, cpumask_of(target)));
+ WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(irq->irq_num, cpumask_of(target)));
irq->cpu = target;
return 0;