On 18/05/2021 14:09, Yang Yingliang wrote:Yes, I missed that, it should be changed too.
irq allocated with devm_request_irq should not be freed using
free_irq, because doing so causes a dangling pointer, and a
subsequent double free.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c
index 499c770d405c..684f762bcfb3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c
@@ -4811,9 +4811,9 @@ hisi_sas_v3_destroy_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba)
{
int i;
- free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, 1), hisi_hba);
- free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, 2), hisi_hba);
- free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, 11), hisi_hba);
+ devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, 1), hisi_hba);
+ devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, 2), hisi_hba);
+ devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, 11), hisi_hba);
for (i = 0; i < hisi_hba->cq_nvecs; i++) {
struct hisi_sas_cq *cq = &hisi_hba->cq[i];
int nr = hisi_sas_intr_conv ? 16 : 16 + i;
Does the free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, nr, cq)) call also need to change (not shown)?
I keep the original logic here, only avoid double free.
Having said that, why have these at all if we use devm_request_irq()? devm_irq_release() calls free_irq().
Thanks,
John
.