Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm/sparse: free section usage memory in case populate_section_memmap failed
From: Dong Aisheng
Date: Wed May 19 2021 - 00:05:12 EST
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 7:43 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 06:25:28PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 6:09 PM Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 07:20:41PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > > > Free section usage memory in case populate_section_memmap failed.
> > > > We use map_count to track the remain unused memory to be freed.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > mm/sparse.c | 2 ++
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> > > > index 7ac481353b6b..98bfacc763da 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/sparse.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> > > > @@ -549,12 +549,14 @@ static void __init sparse_init_nid(int nid, unsigned long pnum_begin,
> > > > __func__, nid);
> > > > pnum_begin = pnum;
> > > > sparse_buffer_fini();
> > > > + memblock_free_early(__pa(usage), map_count * mem_section_usage_size());
> > >
> > > I'd move both sparse_buffer_fini() and freeing of 'usage' memory after the
> > > failed label.
> > >
> >
> > Doing that needs to introduce another 'failed' label.
> > Do you think if it's necessary?
>
> In general, it's preferred way of error handling:
>
Okay, if no objections, i will do it in V2.
Thanks
Regards
Aisheng
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html#centralized-exiting-of-functions
>
> > e.g.
> > diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> > index 7ac481353b6b..408b737e168e 100644
> > --- a/mm/sparse.c
> > +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> > @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ static void __init sparse_init_nid(int nid,
> > unsigned long pnum_begin,
> > mem_section_usage_size() * map_count);
> > if (!usage) {
> > pr_err("%s: node[%d] usemap allocation failed", __func__, nid);
> > - goto failed;
> > + goto failed1;
> > }
> > sparse_buffer_init(map_count * section_map_size(), nid);
> > for_each_present_section_nr(pnum_begin, pnum) {
> > @@ -548,17 +548,20 @@ static void __init sparse_init_nid(int nid,
> > unsigned long pnum_begin,
> > pr_err("%s: node[%d] memory map backing
> > failed. Some memory will not be available.",
> > __func__, nid);
> > pnum_begin = pnum;
> > - sparse_buffer_fini();
> > - goto failed;
> > + goto failed2;
> > }
> > check_usemap_section_nr(nid, usage);
> > sparse_init_one_section(__nr_to_section(pnum), pnum, map, usage,
> > SECTION_IS_EARLY);
> > usage = (void *) usage + mem_section_usage_size();
> > + map_count--;
> > }
> > sparse_buffer_fini();
> > return;
> > -failed:
> > +failed2:
> > + sparse_buffer_fini();
> > + memblock_free_early(__pa(usage), map_count * mem_section_usage_size());
> > +failed1:
> > /* We failed to allocate, mark all the following pnums as not present */
> > for_each_present_section_nr(pnum_begin, pnum) {
> > struct mem_section *ms;
> >
> > Regards
> > Aisheng
> > > > goto failed;
> > > > }
> > > > check_usemap_section_nr(nid, usage);
> > > > sparse_init_one_section(__nr_to_section(pnum), pnum, map, usage,
> > > > SECTION_IS_EARLY);
> > > > usage = (void *) usage + mem_section_usage_size();
> > > > + map_count--;
> > > > }
> > > > sparse_buffer_fini();
> > > > return;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sincerely yours,
> > > Mike.
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.