Re: [PATCH v3 12/16] docs: PCI: acpi-info.rst: replace some characters

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 12:18:29PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The conversion tools used during DocBook/LaTeX/html/Markdown->ReST
> conversion and some cut-and-pasted text contain some characters that
> aren't easily reachable on standard keyboards and/or could cause
> troubles when parsed by the documentation build system.
> 
> Replace the occurences of the following characters:
> 
> 	- U+00a0 (' '): NO-BREAK SPACE
> 	  as it can cause lines being truncated on PDF output
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>

Apparently you missed
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210512212938.GA2516413@bjorn-Precision-5520
where I pointed out a couple issues (3 spaces after period in first
hunk, extra whitespace at end of "know about it." hunk) and added my
ack.

The subject line would be more useful as:

  docs: PCI: Replace non-breaking spaces to avoid PDF issues

It's fine to defer those issues if you want, but this is still:

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  Documentation/PCI/acpi-info.rst | 18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/acpi-info.rst b/Documentation/PCI/acpi-info.rst
> index 060217081c79..34c64a5a66ec 100644
> --- a/Documentation/PCI/acpi-info.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/PCI/acpi-info.rst
> @@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ or if the device has INTx interrupts connected by platform interrupt
>  controllers and a _PRT is needed to describe those connections.
>  
>  ACPI resource description is done via _CRS objects of devices in the ACPI
> -namespace [2].   The _CRS is like a generalized PCI BAR: the OS can read
> +namespace [2].   The _CRS is like a generalized PCI BAR: the OS can read
>  _CRS and figure out what resource is being consumed even if it doesn't have
> -a driver for the device [3].  That's important because it means an old OS
> +a driver for the device [3].  That's important because it means an old OS
>  can work correctly even on a system with new devices unknown to the OS.
>  The new devices might not do anything, but the OS can at least make sure no
>  resources conflict with them.
> @@ -41,15 +41,15 @@ ACPI, that device will have a specific _HID/_CID that tells the OS what
>  driver to bind to it, and the _CRS tells the OS and the driver where the
>  device's registers are.
>  
> -PCI host bridges are PNP0A03 or PNP0A08 devices.  Their _CRS should
> -describe all the address space they consume.  This includes all the windows
> +PCI host bridges are PNP0A03 or PNP0A08 devices.  Their _CRS should
> +describe all the address space they consume.  This includes all the windows
>  they forward down to the PCI bus, as well as registers of the host bridge
> -itself that are not forwarded to PCI.  The host bridge registers include
> +itself that are not forwarded to PCI.  The host bridge registers include
>  things like secondary/subordinate bus registers that determine the bus
>  range below the bridge, window registers that describe the apertures, etc.
>  These are all device-specific, non-architected things, so the only way a
>  PNP0A03/PNP0A08 driver can manage them is via _PRS/_CRS/_SRS, which contain
> -the device-specific details.  The host bridge registers also include ECAM
> +the device-specific details.  The host bridge registers also include ECAM
>  space, since it is consumed by the host bridge.
>  
>  ACPI defines a Consumer/Producer bit to distinguish the bridge registers
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ the PNP0A03/PNP0A08 device itself.  The workaround was to describe the
>  bridge registers (including ECAM space) in PNP0C02 catch-all devices [6].
>  With the exception of ECAM, the bridge register space is device-specific
>  anyway, so the generic PNP0A03/PNP0A08 driver (pci_root.c) has no need to
> -know about it.  
> +know about it.  
>  
>  New architectures should be able to use "Consumer" Extended Address Space
>  descriptors in the PNP0A03 device for bridge registers, including ECAM,
> @@ -75,9 +75,9 @@ ia64 kernels assume all address space descriptors, including "Consumer"
>  Extended Address Space ones, are windows, so it would not be safe to
>  describe bridge registers this way on those architectures.
>  
> -PNP0C02 "motherboard" devices are basically a catch-all.  There's no
> +PNP0C02 "motherboard" devices are basically a catch-all.  There's no
>  programming model for them other than "don't use these resources for
> -anything else."  So a PNP0C02 _CRS should claim any address space that is
> +anything else."  So a PNP0C02 _CRS should claim any address space that is
>  (1) not claimed by _CRS under any other device object in the ACPI namespace
>  and (2) should not be assigned by the OS to something else.
>  
> -- 
> 2.31.1
>