Re: [PATCH -next resend] sfc: farch: fix compile warning in efx_farch_dimension_resources()

[Edward Cree]

On 20/05/2021 03:13, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> On 2021/5/19 22:40, Edward Cree wrote:
>> As I said the first time you sent this:
>> Reverse xmas tree is messed up here, please fix.
>> Apart from that, LGTM.
> 
> Do you mean like this:
That's one way to do it.  But, a couple of nits:

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
> 
> index 6048b08b89ec..b16f04cf7223 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
> @@ -1668,10 +1668,10 @@ void efx_farch_rx_pull_indir_table(struct efx_nic *efx)
>   */
>  void efx_farch_dimension_resources(struct efx_nic *efx, unsigned sram_lim_qw)
>  {
> -    unsigned vi_count, total_tx_channels;
> +    unsigned total_tx_channels, vi_count;
No need to change the order of decls within a line.
> 
Probably this blank line should be removed while we're at it.
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
> -    struct siena_nic_data *nic_data = efx->nic_data;
> +    struct siena_nic_data *nic_data;
>      unsigned buftbl_min;
>  #endif
> 
> @@ -1679,6 +1679,7 @@ void efx_farch_dimension_resources(struct efx_nic *efx, unsigned sram_lim_qw)
>      vi_count = max(efx->n_channels, total_tx_channels * EFX_MAX_TXQ_PER_CHANNEL);
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SFC_SRIOV
> +    nic_data = efx->nic_data;
>      /* Account for the buffer table entries backing the datapath channels
>       * and the descriptor caches for those channels.
>       */
Otherwise, looks fine.
-ed