Re: [RFC v2 27/32] x86/tdx: Exclude Shared bit from __PHYSICAL_MASK

[Dave Hansen]

On 5/20/21 2:18 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> I understand the desire to have a unique prefix, but tdg is is _too_ close to
> tdx.  I don't want to spend the next N years wondering if tdg is a typo or intended.


Sathya has even mis-typed "tdx" instead of "tdg" this in his own
changelogs up to this point.  That massively weakens the argument that
"tdg" is a good idea.