Re: [RFC v2 27/32] x86/tdx: Exclude Shared bit from __PHYSICAL_MASK

[Andi Kleen]

On 5/20/2021 2:28 PM, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> On 5/20/21 2:23 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > Sathya has even mis-typed "tdx" instead of "tdg" this in his own
> > changelogs up to this point.  That massively weakens the argument that
> > "tdg" is a good idea.
>
> It is not a typo. But when we did the initial rename from "tdx_" -> 
> "tdg_",
> somehow I missed the change log change. That's why I am bit reluctant
> to go for another rename (since we have scan change log, comments and 
> code)
> in all the patches.


Yes I agree. If there's another rename it should be after a full review 
by all the maintainers. If there is still consensus that a rename is 
needed then it can be done then.

And we'll just hope that Sean's brain will get used to tdg_ by then.


-Andi