Re: [PATCH 04/16] soc: renesas: Add ARCH_R9A07G044{L,LC} for the new RZ/G2{L,LC} SoC's

[Lad, Prabhakar]

Hi Geert,

Thank you for the review.

On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 2:25 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 9:23 PM Lad Prabhakar
> <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Add ARCH_R9A07G044{L,LC} as a configuration symbol for the new Renesas
> > RZ/G2{L,LC} SoC's.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/drivers/soc/renesas/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/renesas/Kconfig
> > @@ -279,6 +279,16 @@ config ARCH_R8A774B1
> >         help
> >           This enables support for the Renesas RZ/G2N SoC.
> >
> > +config ARCH_R9A07G044L
> > +       bool "ARM64 Platform support for RZ/G2L SoC"
>
> Please drop the "SoC", for consistency with other entries.
>
Oops will do that.

> > +       help
> > +         This enables support for the Renesas RZ/G2L SoC.
> > +
> > +config ARCH_R9A07G044LC
> > +       bool "ARM64 Platform support for RZ/G2LC SoC"
>
> Likewise.
>
will do.

> > +       help
> > +         This enables support for the Renesas RZ/G2LC SoC.
> > +
> >  endif # ARM64
>
> Given LSI DEVID is the same, do we need both, or can we do with a
> single ARCH_R9A07G044?
>
The reason behind adding separate configs was in case if we wanted to
just build an image for RZ/G2L and not RZ/G2LC this would increase
image size and also build unneeded dtb's.

Cheers,
Prabhakar

> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds