On 5/21/21 5:10 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:41:30AM -0700, David Bartley wrote:
This is required to support Zen3 APUs in k10temp.
Signed-off-by: David Bartley <andareed@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/amd_nb.c | 3 +++
include/linux/pci_ids.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_nb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_nb.c
index 09083094eb57..23dda362dc0f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_nb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_nb.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_17H_M60H_DF_F4 0x144c
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_17H_M70H_DF_F4 0x1444
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_DF_F4 0x1654
+#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_M50H_DF_F4 0x166e
/* Protect the PCI config register pairs used for SMN and DF indirect access. */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(smn_mutex);
@@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id amd_nb_misc_ids[] = {
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_CNB17H_F3) },
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_17H_M70H_DF_F3) },
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_DF_F3) },
+ { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_M50H_DF_F3) },
{}
};
@@ -72,6 +74,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id amd_nb_link_ids[] = {
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_17H_M60H_DF_F4) },
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_17H_M70H_DF_F4) },
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_DF_F4) },
+ { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_M50H_DF_F4) },
{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_CNB17H_F4) },
{}
};
diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
index 4c3fa5293d76..5356ccf1c275 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
@@ -555,6 +555,7 @@
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_17H_M60H_DF_F3 0x144b
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_17H_M70H_DF_F3 0x1443
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_DF_F3 0x1653
+#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_M50H_DF_F3 0x166d
I don't see this define used anywhere else besides amd_nb.c. If there's
no use for it outside of that file, I'm moving it there...?
Or does it need to get added to that k10temp_id_table in k10temp.c too?
[+Guenter]
I think it needs to be added to k10temp.c as well. In the meanwhile, k10temp_probe() shall be extended with support for family 19h, model 0x5x.