Re: [PATCH] LOCKDEP: use depends on LOCKDEP_SUPPORT instead of $ARCH list

[Randy Dunlap]

On 5/17/21 12:11 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Both arch/um/ and arch/xtensa/ cause a Kconfig warning for LOCKDEP.
>> These arch-es select LOCKDEP_SUPPORT but they are not listed as one
>> of the arch-es that LOCKDEP depends on.
>>
>> Since (16) arch-es define the Kconfig symbol LOCKDEP_SUPPORT if they
>> intend to have LOCKDEP support, replace the awkward list of
>> arch-es that LOCKDEP depends on with the LOCKDEP_SUPPORT symbol.
>>
>> Fixes this kconfig warning: (for both um and xtensa)
>>
>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for LOCKDEP
>>   Depends on [n]: DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT [=y] && (FRAME_POINTER [=n] || MIPS || PPC || S390 || MICROBLAZE || ARM || ARC || X86)
>>   Selected by [y]:
>>   - PROVE_LOCKING [=y] && DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT [=y]
>>   - LOCK_STAT [=y] && DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT [=y]
>>   - DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC [=y] && DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT [=y]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
>> Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ---
>>  lib/Kconfig.debug |    2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> --- linux-next-20210514.orig/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> +++ linux-next-20210514/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> @@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ config LOCKDEP
>>  	bool
>>  	depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT
>>  	select STACKTRACE
>> -	depends on FRAME_POINTER || MIPS || PPC || S390 || MICROBLAZE || ARM || ARC || X86
>> +	depends on FRAME_POINTER || LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
> 
> Ok - the FRAME_POINTER bit is weird. Are there any architectures that have 
> FRAME_POINTER defined but no LOCKDEP_SUPPORT?

arch/h8300/ does AFAICT.
and arch/parisc/ has user-choosable FRAME_POINTER and no LOCKDEP support.

-- 
~Randy