Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] s390/vfio-ap: control access to PQAP(AQIC) interception handler

[Jason J. Herne]

On 5/25/21 9:26 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 09:24:59AM -0400, Jason J. Herne wrote:
> > change the function pointer to point to vfio_ap_ops:handle_pqap(). When we
> > unload the module we change the function pointer back to the stub.  The
> > updates should be atomic operations so no lock needed, right?
>
> No
>
> Jason

Okay... Would you be willing to elaborate, please? A counter argument, or a simple 
explanation would be appreciated. A simple "no" does not really do much to advance the 
discussion :).

I'm fairly sure that a 64-bit pointer would be updated atomically. A reader of this value 
is either going to see value A or value B, not the high half of A and the low half of B. 
Maybe we also need a memory barrier to prevent stale values from being seen on another core?

--
-- Jason J. Herne (jjherne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)