Re: [PATCH] io_uring: Add to traces the req pointer when available

From: Stefan Metzmacher
Date: Wed May 26 2021 - 08:38:58 EST


Hi,

>> @@ -333,13 +333,14 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_complete,
>> */
>> TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_submit_sqe,
>>
>> - TP_PROTO(void *ctx, u8 opcode, u64 user_data, bool force_nonblock,
>> - bool sq_thread),
>> + TP_PROTO(void *ctx, void *req, u8 opcode, u64 user_data,
>> + bool force_nonblock, bool sq_thread),
>>
>> - TP_ARGS(ctx, opcode, user_data, force_nonblock, sq_thread),
>> + TP_ARGS(ctx, req, opcode, user_data, force_nonblock, sq_thread),
>>
>> TP_STRUCT__entry (
>> __field( void *, ctx )
>> + __field( void *, req )
>> __field( u8, opcode )
>> __field( u64, user_data )
>> __field( bool, force_nonblock )
>> @@ -348,26 +349,42 @@ TRACE_EVENT(io_uring_submit_sqe,
>>
>> TP_fast_assign(
>> __entry->ctx = ctx;
>> + __entry->req = req;
>> __entry->opcode = opcode;
>> __entry->user_data = user_data;
>> __entry->force_nonblock = force_nonblock;
>> __entry->sq_thread = sq_thread;
>> ),
>>
>> - TP_printk("ring %p, op %d, data 0x%llx, non block %d, sq_thread %d",
>> - __entry->ctx, __entry->opcode,
>> - (unsigned long long) __entry->user_data,
>> - __entry->force_nonblock, __entry->sq_thread)
>> + TP_printk("ring %p, req %p, op %d, data 0x%llx, non block %d, "
>> + "sq_thread %d", __entry->ctx, __entry->req,
>> + __entry->opcode, (unsigned long long)__entry->user_data,
>> + __entry->force_nonblock, __entry->sq_thread)
>> );

If that gets changed, could be also include the personality id and flags here,
and maybe also translated the opcode and flags to human readable strings?

metze