Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: power: Introduce 'assigned-performance-states' property

[Rajendra Nayak]

On 5/27/2021 11:46 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27-05-21, 11:42, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> > While most devices within power-domains which support performance states,
> > scale the performance state dynamically, some devices might want to
> > set a static/default performance state while the device is active.
> > These devices typically would also run off a fixed clock and not support
> > dynamically scaling the device's performance, also known as DVFS techniques.
> > Add a property 'assigned-performance-states' which client devices can
> > use to set this default performance state on their power-domains.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   .../devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml    | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> > index aed51e9..88cebf2 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml
> > @@ -66,6 +66,19 @@ properties:
> >         by the given provider should be subdomains of the domain specified
> >         by this binding.
> >   
> > +  assigned-performance-states:
>
> Why is this named assigned and not "default"? Just curious :)

I took the cue from assigned-clock-rates/assigned-clock-parents but i am perfectly
fine calling it default-performance-states as well :)

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation