Re: [clocksource] 8901ecc231: stress-ng.lockbus.ops_per_sec -9.5% regression

[Andi Kleen]

>      
>      Nevertheless, it is quite possible that real-world use will result in
>      some situation requiring that high-stress workloads run on hardware
>      not designed to accommodate them, and also requiring that the kernel
>      refrain from marking clocksources unstable.
>      
>      Therefore, provide an out-of-tree patch that reacts to this situation


out-of-tree means it will not be submitted?


I think it would make sense upstream, but perhaps guarded with some option.