On Mon, 24 May 2021 00:02:20 PDT (-0700), sunnanyong@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
With "riscv: mm: add THP support on 64-bit", mk_pmd() function
introduce build errors,
1.build with CONFIG_ARCH_RV32I=y:
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h: In function 'mk_pmd':
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h:513:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'pfn_pmd';
did you mean 'pfn_pgd'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2.build with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y && CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=n
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h: In function 'mk_pmd':
include/asm-generic/memory_model.h:64:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'page_to_section';
did you mean 'present_section'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
Use macro definition instead of inline function for mk_pmd
to fix the above problems.It is similar to the mk_pte macro.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 4b708ae08910..f35d9c90d4cb 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -508,10 +508,7 @@ static inline unsigned long pmd_pfn(pmd_t pmd)
return ((__pmd_to_phys(pmd) & PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
}
-static inline pmd_t mk_pmd(struct page *page, pgprot_t prot)
-{
- return pfn_pmd(page_to_pfn(page), prot);
-}
+#define mk_pmd(page, prot) pfn_pmd(page_to_pfn(page), prot)
static inline pmd_t pmd_modify(pmd_t pmd, pgprot_t newprot)
{
Thanks, this is on for-next.