[PATCH net-next] sctp: sm_statefuns: Fix spelling mistakes
From: Zheng Yongjun
Date: Sun May 30 2021 - 21:48:15 EST
Fix some spelling mistakes in comments:
genereate ==> generate
correclty ==> correctly
boundries ==> boundaries
failes ==> fails
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
index fd1e319eda00..68e7d14c3799 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_do_5_1C_ack(struct net *net,
sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_NEW_STATE,
SCTP_STATE(SCTP_STATE_COOKIE_ECHOED));
- /* SCTP-AUTH: genereate the assocition shared keys so that
+ /* SCTP-AUTH: generate the assocition shared keys so that
* we can potentially signe the COOKIE-ECHO.
*/
sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_SHKEY, SCTP_NULL());
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_do_5_1D_ce(struct net *net,
/* Add all the state machine commands now since we've created
* everything. This way we don't introduce memory corruptions
- * during side-effect processing and correclty count established
+ * during side-effect processing and correctly count established
* associations.
*/
sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_NEW_ASOC, SCTP_ASOC(new_asoc));
@@ -2950,7 +2950,7 @@ enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_do_9_2_reshutack(
commands);
/* Since we are not going to really process this INIT, there
- * is no point in verifying chunk boundries. Just generate
+ * is no point in verifying chunk boundaries. Just generate
* the SHUTDOWN ACK.
*/
reply = sctp_make_shutdown_ack(asoc, chunk);
@@ -3560,7 +3560,7 @@ enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_do_9_2_final(struct net *net,
goto nomem_chunk;
/* Do all the commands now (after allocation), so that we
- * have consistent state if memory allocation failes
+ * have consistent state if memory allocation fails
*/
sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_EVENT_ULP, SCTP_ULPEVENT(ev));
--
2.25.1