Re: [PATCH 1/1] EDAC, mpc85xx: Fix error return code in two functions

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Mon May 31 2021 - 05:23:27 EST

Next message: Akhil P Oommen: "Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm/msm/a6xx: avoid shadow NULL reference in failure path"
Previous message: Dong Aisheng: "Re: [PATCH 1/1] dma-contiguous: return early for dt case in dma_contiguous_reserve"
In reply to: Leizhen (ThunderTown): "Re: [PATCH 1/1] EDAC, mpc85xx: Fix error return code in two functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 05:15:54PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
> So how about change to -ENODEV?

Yah, better.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Next message: Akhil P Oommen: "Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm/msm/a6xx: avoid shadow NULL reference in failure path"
Previous message: Dong Aisheng: "Re: [PATCH 1/1] dma-contiguous: return early for dt case in dma_contiguous_reserve"
In reply to: Leizhen (ThunderTown): "Re: [PATCH 1/1] EDAC, mpc85xx: Fix error return code in two functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]