Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the i2c tree

[Hsin-Yi Wang]

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:55 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> > After merging the i2c tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:1250:
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem.c:97:13: error: conflicting types for 'pm_suspend'
> >    97 | static void pm_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> >       |             ^~~~~~~~~~
> > In file included from include/linux/regulator/consumer.h:35,
> >                  from include/linux/i2c.h:18,
> >                  from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:39,
> >                  from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.h:14,
> >                  from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.h:12,
> >                  from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:44:
> > include/linux/suspend.h:331:12: note: previous declaration of 'pm_suspend' was here
> >   331 | extern int pm_suspend(suspend_state_t state);
> >       |            ^~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> >   5a7b95fb993e ("i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter")
> >
> > interacting with commit
> >
> >   3f51b7e1f36a ("drm/i915/selftests: Add a simple exerciser for suspend/hibernate")
> >
> > from Linus' tree (v4.20-rc1)
>
> Thank you very much for taking care of this!
>

Hi, this issue is fixed in
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel/commit/?h=drm-intel-gt-next&id=5b11705608898c31a1cae5340555ee60d5a4fa45

And I think the pull request is in
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2021-May/267588.html

Thanks

>
> > I have added the following merge fix patch:
> >
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 10:25:49 +1000
> > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Avoid name clash with pm_ global functions
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks like the proper solution to me. I think this should be added to
> the i915 tree. D'accord everyone?
>
> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>    Wolfram
>