On Thu 20 May 02:20 CDT 2021, Sibi Sankar wrote:
On 2021-05-20 09:26, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12-05-21, 13:41, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> > Add SC7280 to cpufreq-dt-platdev blacklist since the actual scaling is
> > handled by the 'qcom-cpufreq-hw' driver.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> > index 5e07065ec22f..345418b8250e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> > @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id blacklist[]
> > __initconst = {
> > { .compatible = "qcom,msm8996", },
> > { .compatible = "qcom,qcs404", },
> > { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180", },
> > + { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280", },
> > { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845", },
> >
> > { .compatible = "st,stih407", },
>
> Applied 1/2. Thanks.
>
> What do you want to do for 2/2 ? Go through my tree? need an update ?
Lets skip pulling in 2/2 for now.
In particular it's ripe for merge conflicts, so I'd prefer to take it
through my tree.
It depends on a few other changes to land first and the cpufreq node
for sc7280 needs a re-spin.
What other dependencies do we have?
I dropped the reg-names from the cpufreq node and merged that change.
Regards,
Bjorn