Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] thermal: qcom: tsens-v1: Add support for MSM8994 TSENS

From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Wed Jun 02 2021 - 14:19:26 EST

Hi Konrad,


On 09/02/2021 20:53, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> MSM8994, despite being heavily based on MSM8974, uses the
> 1.2 version of TSENS. Also, 8994 being 8994, it has a custom
> way of calculating the slope.
>
> Also tested on 8976 (by a person who didn't want to be named)
> to make sure the 11->16 max_sensors changes didn't break anything.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml | 1 +

Please split binding and code into two separate patches.

Without full understanding of the changes it is hard to comment the code
but, AFAICT, these changes should have a set of cleanups before (see below).

> drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v1.c | 291 +++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 3 +
> drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
> index 95462e071ab4..f194e914a62e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ properties:
> items:
> - enum:
> - qcom,msm8976-tsens
> + - qcom,msm8994-tsens
> - qcom,qcs404-tsens
> - const: qcom,tsens-v1
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v1.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v1.c
> index 3c19a3800c6d..2127b6edd1ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v1.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-v1.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,99 @@
> #define CAL_SEL_MASK 7
> #define CAL_SEL_SHIFT 0
>
> +/* eeprom layout data for 8994 */
> +#define MSM8994_BASE0_MASK 0x3ff
> +#define MSM8994_BASE1_MASK 0xffc00
> +#define MSM8994_BASE0_SHIFT 0
> +#define MSM8994_BASE1_SHIFT 10
> +
> +#define MSM8994_S0_MASK 0xf00000
> +#define MSM8994_S1_MASK 0xf000000
> +#define MSM8994_S2_MASK 0xf0000000
> +#define MSM8994_S3_MASK 0xf
> +#define MSM8994_S4_MASK 0xf0
> +#define MSM8994_S5_MASK 0xf00
> +#define MSM8994_S6_MASK 0xf000
> +#define MSM8994_S7_MASK 0xf0000
> +#define MSM8994_S8_MASK 0xf00000
> +#define MSM8994_S9_MASK 0xf000000
> +#define MSM8994_S10_MASK 0xf0000000
> +#define MSM8994_S11_MASK 0xf
> +#define MSM8994_S12_MASK 0xf0
> +#define MSM8994_S13_MASK 0xf00
> +#define MSM8994_S14_MASK 0xf000
> +#define MSM8994_S15_MASK 0xf0000
> +
> +#define MSM8994_S0_SHIFT 20
> +#define MSM8994_S1_SHIFT 24
> +#define MSM8994_S2_SHIFT 28
> +#define MSM8994_S3_SHIFT 0
> +#define MSM8994_S4_SHIFT 4
> +#define MSM8994_S5_SHIFT 8
> +#define MSM8994_S6_SHIFT 12
> +#define MSM8994_S7_SHIFT 16
> +#define MSM8994_S8_SHIFT 20
> +#define MSM8994_S9_SHIFT 24
> +#define MSM8994_S10_SHIFT 28
> +#define MSM8994_S11_SHIFT 0
> +#define MSM8994_S12_SHIFT 4
> +#define MSM8994_S13_SHIFT 8
> +#define MSM8994_S14_SHIFT 12
> +#define MSM8994_S15_SHIFT 16
> +
> +#define MSM8994_CAL_SEL_MASK 0x700000
> +#define MSM8994_CAL_SEL_SHIFT 20
> +
> +#define MSM8994_BASE0_REDUN_MASK 0x7fe00000
> +#define MSM8994_BASE1_BIT0_REDUN_MASK 0x80000000
> +#define MSM8994_BASE1_BIT1_9_REDUN_MASK 0x1ff
> +#define MSM8994_BASE0_REDUN_SHIFT 21
> +#define MSM8994_BASE1_BIT0_REDUN_SHIFT_COMPUTE 31
> +
> +#define MSM8994_S0_REDUN_MASK 0x1e00
> +#define MSM8994_S1_REDUN_MASK 0x1e000
> +#define MSM8994_S2_REDUN_MASK 0x1e0000
> +#define MSM8994_S3_REDUN_MASK 0x1e00000
> +#define MSM8994_S4_REDUN_MASK 0x1e000000
> +#define MSM8994_S5_REDUN_MASK_BIT0_2 0xe0000000
> +#define MSM8994_S5_REDUN_MASK_BIT3 0x800000
> +#define MSM8994_S6_REDUN_MASK 0xf000000
> +#define MSM8994_S7_REDUN_MASK 0xf0000000
> +#define MSM8994_S8_REDUN_MASK 0xf
> +#define MSM8994_S9_REDUN_MASK 0xf0
> +#define MSM8994_S10_REDUN_MASK 0xf00
> +#define MSM8994_S11_REDUN_MASK 0xf000
> +#define MSM8994_S12_REDUN_MASK 0xf0000
> +#define MSM8994_S13_REDUN_MASK 0xf00000
> +#define MSM8994_S14_REDUN_MASK 0xf000000
> +#define MSM8994_S15_REDUN_MASK 0xf0000000
> +
> +#define MSM8994_S0_REDUN_SHIFT 9
> +#define MSM8994_S1_REDUN_SHIFT 13
> +#define MSM8994_S2_REDUN_SHIFT 17
> +#define MSM8994_S3_REDUN_SHIFT 21
> +#define MSM8994_S4_REDUN_SHIFT 25
> +#define MSM8994_S5_REDUN_SHIFT_BIT0_2 29
> +#define MSM8994_S5_REDUN_SHIFT_BIT3 23
> +#define MSM8994_S6_REDUN_SHIFT 24
> +#define MSM8994_S7_REDUN_SHIFT 28
> +#define MSM8994_S8_REDUN_SHIFT 0
> +#define MSM8994_S9_REDUN_SHIFT 4
> +#define MSM8994_S10_REDUN_SHIFT 8
> +#define MSM8994_S11_REDUN_SHIFT 12
> +#define MSM8994_S12_REDUN_SHIFT 16
> +#define MSM8994_S13_REDUN_SHIFT 20
> +#define MSM8994_S14_REDUN_SHIFT 24
> +#define MSM8994_S15_REDUN_SHIFT 28
> +
> +#define MSM8994_REDUN_SEL_MASK 0x7
> +#define MSM8994_CAL_SEL_REDUN_MASK 0xe0000000
> +#define MSM8994_CAL_SEL_REDUN_SHIFT 29
> +
> +#define BKP_SEL 0x3
> +#define BKP_REDUN_SEL 0xe0000000
> +#define BKP_REDUN_SHIFT 29
> +
> static void compute_intercept_slope_8976(struct tsens_priv *priv,
> u32 *p1, u32 *p2, u32 mode)
> {
> @@ -166,6 +259,37 @@ static void compute_intercept_slope_8976(struct tsens_priv *priv,
> }
> }
>

That deserves a cartdrige with a good explanation of why this function
is doing all this. Without enough details, it is hard to review the code.

> +static void compute_intercept_slope_8994(struct tsens_priv *priv,
> + u32 *base0, u32 *base1, u32 *p, u32 mode)
> +{
> + int adc_code_of_tempx, i, num, den;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) {
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev,
> + "%s: sensor%d - data_point1:%#x data_point2:%#x\n",
> + __func__, i, base0[i], base1[i]);
> +
> + priv->sensor[i].slope = SLOPE_DEFAULT;
> + if (mode == TWO_PT_CALIB) {
> + /*
> + * slope (m) = adc_code2 - adc_code1 (y2 - y1)/
> + * temp_120_degc - temp_30_degc (x2 - x1)
> + */
> + num = base1[i] - base0[i];

As the caller of the function is copying the value of base[0] to the
entire array, whatever 'i', base[i] == base[0], so the parameters can be
replaced by a single int.

Then the code becomes:

num = base1 - base0;
num *= SLOPE_FACTOR;
den = CAL_DEGC_PT2 - CAL_DEGC_PT1;
slope = num / den;

There is no change in the values, so 'slope' can be precomputed before
the loop. We end up with:

int adc_code_of_tempx, i, num, den;
int slope;

/*
* slope (m) = adc_code2 - adc_code1 (y2 - y1)/
* temp_120_degc - temp_30_degc (x2 - x1)
*/
num = base1 - base0;
num *= SLOPE_FACTOR;
den = CAL_DEGC_PT2 - CAL_DEGC_PT1;
slope = num / den;

for (i = 0; i < priv->num_sensors; i++) {

priv->sensor[i].slope = mode == TWO_PT_CALIB ? slope :
SLOPE_DEFAULT;


> + adc_code_of_tempx = base0[i] + p[i];
> +
> + priv->sensor[i].offset = (adc_code_of_tempx * SLOPE_FACTOR) -
> + (CAL_DEGC_PT1 * priv->sensor[i].slope);
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: offset:%d\n", __func__,
> + priv->sensor[i].offset);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int calibrate_v1(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> {
> u32 base0 = 0, base1 = 0;
> @@ -297,14 +421,143 @@ static int calibrate_8976(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> return 0;
> }

Same comment as above. The more the details, the easier for the people
to review the code.

> -/* v1.x: msm8956,8976,qcs404,405 */
> +static int calibrate_8994(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> +{
> + int base0[16] = { 0 }, base1[16] = { 0 }, i;
> + u32 p[16];

p stands for ?

> + int mode = 0;
> + u32 *calib0, *calib1, *calib2, *calib_mode, *calib_rsel;
> + u32 calib_redun_sel;
> +
> + /* 0x40d0-0x40dc */
> + calib0 = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib");

Fix qfprom_read, by returning an int and using nvmem_cell_read_u32
(separate series).

It seems like all call sites are expecting an int.

> + if (IS_ERR(calib0))
> + return PTR_ERR(calib0);
> +
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: calib0: [0] = %i, [1] = %i, [2] = %i\n",
> + __func__, calib0[0], calib0[1], calib0[2]);
> +
> + /* 0x41c0-0x41c8 */
> + calib1 = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib_redun1_2");> + if (IS_ERR(calib1))
> + return PTR_ERR(calib1);
> +
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: calib1: [0] = %i, [1] = %i\n",
> + __func__, calib1[0], calib1[1]);
> +
> + /* 0x41cc-0x41d0 */
> + calib2 = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib_redun3");
> + if (IS_ERR(calib2))
> + return PTR_ERR(calib2);
> +
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: calib2: [0] = %i\n", __func__, calib2[0]);
> +
> + /* 0x4440-0x4448 */
> + calib_mode = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib_redun4_5");
> + if (IS_ERR(calib_mode))
> + return PTR_ERR(calib_mode);
> +
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: calib_mode: [0] = %i, [1] = %i\n",
> + __func__, calib1[0], calib1[1]);
> +
> + /* 0x4464-0x4468 */
> + calib_rsel = (u32 *)qfprom_read(priv->dev, "calib_rsel");
> + if (IS_ERR(calib_mode))
> + return PTR_ERR(calib_mode);
> +
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: calib_rsel: [0] = %i\n", __func__, calib_rsel[0]);
> +
> + calib_redun_sel = calib_rsel[0] & MSM8994_CAL_SEL_REDUN_MASK;
> + calib_redun_sel >>= MSM8994_CAL_SEL_REDUN_SHIFT;
> +
> + if (calib_redun_sel == BKP_SEL) {
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: Calibrating in REDUN mode, calib_redun_sel = %i",
> + __func__, calib_redun_sel);
> + mode = calib_mode[1] & MSM8994_REDUN_SEL_MASK;
> +
> + if (mode == TWO_PT_CALIB) {
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: REDUN TWO_PT mode, mode = %i", __func__, mode);
> + base0[0] = (calib1[0] & MSM8994_BASE0_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_BASE0_REDUN_SHIFT;
> + base1[0] = (calib1[0] & MSM8994_BASE1_BIT0_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_BASE1_BIT0_REDUN_SHIFT_COMPUTE;
> + base1[0] |= calib1[1] & MSM8994_BASE1_BIT1_9_REDUN_MASK;
> + p[0] = (calib1[1] & MSM8994_S0_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S0_REDUN_SHIFT;
> + p[1] = (calib1[1] & MSM8994_S1_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S1_REDUN_SHIFT;
> + p[2] = (calib1[1] & MSM8994_S2_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S2_REDUN_SHIFT;
> + p[3] = (calib1[1] & MSM8994_S3_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S3_REDUN_SHIFT;
> + p[4] = (calib1[1] & MSM8994_S4_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S4_REDUN_SHIFT;
> + p[5] = (calib1[1] & MSM8994_S5_REDUN_MASK_BIT0_2) >> MSM8994_S5_REDUN_SHIFT_BIT0_2;
> + p[5] |= (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S5_REDUN_MASK_BIT3) >> MSM8994_S5_REDUN_SHIFT_BIT3;
> + p[6] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S6_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S6_REDUN_SHIFT;
> + p[7] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S7_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S7_REDUN_SHIFT;
> + p[8] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S8_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S8_REDUN_SHIFT;
> + p[9] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S9_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S9_REDUN_SHIFT;
> + p[10] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S10_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S10_REDUN_SHIFT;
> + p[11] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S11_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S11_REDUN_SHIFT;
> + p[12] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S12_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S12_REDUN_SHIFT;
> + p[13] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S13_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S13_REDUN_SHIFT;
> + p[14] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S14_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S14_REDUN_SHIFT;
> + p[15] = (calib2[0] & MSM8994_S15_REDUN_MASK) >> MSM8994_S15_REDUN_SHIFT;

IMO, it is possible to do something simpler (probably bits.h could have
interesting helpers).

> + } else {
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: REDUN NON-TWO_PT mode, mode = %i",
> + __func__, mode);
> + for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
> + p[i] = 532;

No litterals, macros please

And it would be simpler to iniatialize the array with the value.

u32 p[16] = { [ 0 ... 15 ] = MY_532_MACRO };

So no need to use this loop and the other one beliw.

What about replacing 16 by TSENS_SENSOR_MAX ?

> + }
> + } else {
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: Calibrating in NOT-REDUN mode, calib_redun_sel = %i",
> + __func__, calib_redun_sel);
> + mode = (calib0[2] & MSM8994_CAL_SEL_MASK) >> MSM8994_CAL_SEL_SHIFT;
> +
> + if (mode == TWO_PT_CALIB) {
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: NOT-REDUN TWO_PT mode, mode = %i", __func__, mode);
> + base0[0] = (calib0[0] & MSM8994_BASE0_MASK) >> MSM8994_BASE0_SHIFT;
> + base1[0] = (calib0[0] & MSM8994_BASE1_MASK) >> MSM8994_BASE1_SHIFT;
> + p[0] = (calib0[0] & MSM8994_S0_MASK) >> MSM8994_S0_SHIFT;
> + p[1] = (calib0[0] & MSM8994_S1_MASK) >> MSM8994_S1_SHIFT;
> + p[2] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S2_MASK) >> MSM8994_S2_SHIFT;
> + p[3] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S3_MASK) >> MSM8994_S3_SHIFT;
> + p[4] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S4_MASK) >> MSM8994_S4_SHIFT;
> + p[5] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S5_MASK) >> MSM8994_S5_SHIFT;
> + p[6] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S6_MASK) >> MSM8994_S6_SHIFT;
> + p[7] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S7_MASK) >> MSM8994_S7_SHIFT;
> + p[8] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S8_MASK) >> MSM8994_S8_SHIFT;
> + p[9] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S9_MASK) >> MSM8994_S9_SHIFT;
> + p[10] = (calib0[1] & MSM8994_S10_MASK) >> MSM8994_S10_SHIFT;
> + p[11] = (calib0[2] & MSM8994_S11_MASK) >> MSM8994_S11_SHIFT;
> + p[12] = (calib0[2] & MSM8994_S12_MASK) >> MSM8994_S12_SHIFT;
> + p[13] = (calib0[2] & MSM8994_S13_MASK) >> MSM8994_S13_SHIFT;
> + p[14] = (calib0[2] & MSM8994_S14_MASK) >> MSM8994_S14_SHIFT;
> + p[15] = (calib0[2] & MSM8994_S15_MASK) >> MSM8994_S15_SHIFT;
> + } else {
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: NOT-REDUN NON-TWO_PT mode, mode = %i", __func__, mode);
> + for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
> + p[i] = 532;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* 8994 does the slope calc a bit differently than others. */
> + for (i = 1; i < 16; i++) {
> + base0[i] = base0[0];
> + base1[i] = base1[0];
> + }
> +
> + compute_intercept_slope_8994(priv, base0, base1, p, mode);
> + kfree(calib0);
> + kfree(calib1);
> + kfree(calib2);
> + kfree(calib_mode);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* v1.x: msm8956/8976, msm8994 (v1.2), qcs404/qcs405 */
>
> static struct tsens_features tsens_v1_feat = {
> .ver_major = VER_1_X,
> .crit_int = 0,
> .adc = 1,
> .srot_split = 1,
> - .max_sensors = 11,
> + .max_sensors = 16,
> };
>
> static const struct reg_field tsens_v1_regfields[MAX_REGFIELDS] = {
> @@ -323,12 +576,12 @@ static const struct reg_field tsens_v1_regfields[MAX_REGFIELDS] = {
> [INT_EN] = REG_FIELD(TM_INT_EN_OFF, 0, 0),
>
> /* UPPER/LOWER TEMPERATURE THRESHOLDS */
> - REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(LOW_THRESH, TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_STATUS_CTRL_OFF, 0, 9),
> - REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(UP_THRESH, TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_STATUS_CTRL_OFF, 10, 19),
> + REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(LOW_THRESH, TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_STATUS_CTRL_OFF, 0, 9),
> + REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(UP_THRESH, TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_STATUS_CTRL_OFF, 10, 19),
>
> /* UPPER/LOWER INTERRUPTS [CLEAR/STATUS] */
> - REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(LOW_INT_CLEAR, TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_STATUS_CTRL_OFF, 20, 20),
> - REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(UP_INT_CLEAR, TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_STATUS_CTRL_OFF, 21, 21),
> + REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(LOW_INT_CLEAR, TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_STATUS_CTRL_OFF, 20, 20),
> + REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(UP_INT_CLEAR, TM_Sn_UPPER_LOWER_STATUS_CTRL_OFF, 21, 21),
> [LOW_INT_STATUS_0] = REG_FIELD(TM_HIGH_LOW_INT_STATUS_OFF, 0, 0),
> [LOW_INT_STATUS_1] = REG_FIELD(TM_HIGH_LOW_INT_STATUS_OFF, 1, 1),
> [LOW_INT_STATUS_2] = REG_FIELD(TM_HIGH_LOW_INT_STATUS_OFF, 2, 2),
> @@ -349,14 +602,14 @@ static const struct reg_field tsens_v1_regfields[MAX_REGFIELDS] = {
> /* NO CRITICAL INTERRUPT SUPPORT on v1 */
>
> /* Sn_STATUS */
> - REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(LAST_TEMP, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 0, 9),
> - REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(VALID, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 14, 14),
> + REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(LAST_TEMP, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 0, 9),
> + REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(VALID, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 14, 14),
> /* xxx_STATUS bits: 1 == threshold violated */
> - REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(MIN_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 10, 10),
> - REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(LOWER_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 11, 11),
> - REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(UPPER_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 12, 12),
> + REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(MIN_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 10, 10),
> + REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(LOWER_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 11, 11),
> + REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(UPPER_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 12, 12),
> /* No CRITICAL field on v1.x */
> - REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR11(MAX_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 13, 13),
> + REG_FIELD_FOR_EACH_SENSOR16(MAX_STATUS, TM_Sn_STATUS_OFF, 13, 13),
>
> /* TRDY: 1=ready, 0=in progress */
> [TRDY] = REG_FIELD(TM_TRDY_OFF, 0, 0),
> @@ -388,3 +641,17 @@ struct tsens_plat_data data_8976 = {
> .feat = &tsens_v1_feat,
> .fields = tsens_v1_regfields,
> };
> +
> +static const struct tsens_ops ops_8994 = {
> + .init = init_common,
> + .calibrate = calibrate_8994,
> + .get_temp = get_temp_tsens_valid,
> +};
> +
> +struct tsens_plat_data data_8994 = {
> + .num_sensors = 16,
> + .ops = &ops_8994,
> + .hw_ids = (unsigned int []){ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 },

If you have time, in another series, replace this by a single int used
as a bitmask and fix the hw_id loop in tsens.c.

> + .feat = &tsens_v1_feat,
> + .fields = tsens_v1_regfields,
> +};
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> index d8ce3a687b80..96d17afe3460 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> @@ -903,6 +903,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id tsens_table[] = {
> }, {
> .compatible = "qcom,msm8974-tsens",
> .data = &data_8974,
> + }, {
> + .compatible = "qcom,msm8994-tsens",
> + .data = &data_8994,
> }, {
> .compatible = "qcom,msm8976-tsens",
> .data = &data_8976,
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> index f40b625f897e..dfbff7f6442c 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8960;
> extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8916, data_8939, data_8974;
>
> /* TSENS v1 targets */
> -extern struct tsens_plat_data data_tsens_v1, data_8976;
> +extern struct tsens_plat_data data_tsens_v1, data_8976, data_8994;
>
> /* TSENS v2 targets */
> extern struct tsens_plat_data data_8996, data_tsens_v2;
>


--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog