Re: [RFC v2-fix-v2 1/1] x86: Introduce generic protected guest abstraction

[Borislav Petkov]

On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 01:19:07PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> This certainly doesn't capture all of the situations where true would need
> to be returned. For example, SEV, but not SEV-ES, requires that string I/O
> be unrolled, etc.

Yeah, I believe this would be better done for you guys, ontop, as you
know best what needs to be queried where. So this first patch adding
only a stub should be fine. Or you or someone else does the conversion
ontop of the Intel patch and then all patches go together.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette