Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] bootconfig: Add mixed subkeys and value under the same key

From: Devin Moore
Date: Wed Jun 02 2021 - 19:02:43 EST


On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 1:18 AM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is the 4th version of the series which updates bootconfig to
> support mixed subkeys and a value under the same key.
> The 3rd version is completely wrong. I missed to picked up the older
> (v1) patches to v3. So please ignore v3.
>
> Since the kernel cmdline accepts options like
> "aaa.bbb=val1 aaa.bbb.ccc=val2", it is better that the bootconfig
> also support it.
>
> Here is the previous series (v2):
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162157886618.78209.11141970623539574861.stgit@devnote2/
>
> In this version, I rebased on top of the latest linus tree and
> add the build error fix [1/6](*) and a cleanup patch [6/6].
>
> (*) https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162087519356.442660.11385099982318160180.stgit@devnote2/
>
> Changes in v4
> [1/6]:
> - Added from separated thread. This is a fundamental fix.
> [6/6]:
> - New cleanup patch.
>
>
> With this series, sub-keys and a value can co-exist under a parent key.
> For example, following config is allowed.
>
> foo = value1
> foo.bar = value2
>
> Note, since there is no syntax to put a raw value directly under a
> structured key, you have to define it outside of the brace. For example,
>
> foo {
> bar = value1
> bar {
> baz = value2
> qux = value3
> }
> }
>
> Also, the order of the value node under a key is fixed. If there
> are a value and subkeys, the value is always the first child node
> of the key. Thus if user specifies subkeys first, e.g.
>
> foo.bar = value1
> foo = value2
>
> In the program (and /proc/bootconfig), it will be shown as below
>
> foo = value2
> foo.bar = value1
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> ---
>
> Masami Hiramatsu (6):
> tools/bootconfig: Fix a build error accroding to undefined fallthrough
> bootconfig: Change array value to use child node
> bootconfig: Support mixing a value and subkeys under a key
> tools/bootconfig: Support mixed value and subkey test cases
> docs: bootconfig: Update for mixing value and subkeys
> bootconfig: Share the checksum function with tools
>
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/bootconfig.rst | 30 +++++++-
> fs/proc/bootconfig.c | 2 -
> include/linux/bootconfig.h | 58 ++++++++++++++-
> init/main.c | 12 ---
> lib/bootconfig.c | 76 +++++++++++++++-----
> tools/bootconfig/include/linux/bootconfig.h | 4 +
> tools/bootconfig/main.c | 62 +++++++++++-----
> tools/bootconfig/samples/bad-mixed-kv1.bconf | 3 -
> tools/bootconfig/samples/bad-mixed-kv2.bconf | 3 -
> tools/bootconfig/samples/bad-override.bconf | 3 -
> tools/bootconfig/samples/bad-override2.bconf | 3 -
> tools/bootconfig/samples/good-mixed-append.bconf | 4 +
> tools/bootconfig/samples/good-mixed-kv1.bconf | 3 +
> tools/bootconfig/samples/good-mixed-kv2.bconf | 3 +
> tools/bootconfig/samples/good-mixed-kv3.bconf | 6 ++
> tools/bootconfig/samples/good-mixed-override.bconf | 4 +
> 16 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 tools/bootconfig/samples/bad-mixed-kv1.bconf
> delete mode 100644 tools/bootconfig/samples/bad-mixed-kv2.bconf
> delete mode 100644 tools/bootconfig/samples/bad-override.bconf
> delete mode 100644 tools/bootconfig/samples/bad-override2.bconf
> create mode 100644 tools/bootconfig/samples/good-mixed-append.bconf
> create mode 100644 tools/bootconfig/samples/good-mixed-kv1.bconf
> create mode 100644 tools/bootconfig/samples/good-mixed-kv2.bconf
> create mode 100644 tools/bootconfig/samples/good-mixed-kv3.bconf
> create mode 100644 tools/bootconfig/samples/good-mixed-override.bconf
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>


Thanks for the updated patches.
I tested the v4 changes on an Android virtual device(Cuttlefish) with
a variety of
parameters that included array values. I checked the output in /proc/bootconfig
before and after the changes.
I added a new parameter that failed before these changes and it worked great!
Added 'androidboot.hardware=cutf_cvm ' which worked with
'androidboot.hardware.gralloc = "minigbm"' that was already present.

These changes really help Android simplify some boot configuration
processes. We will be using it ASAP.

So,

Tested-by: Devin Moore <devinmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>